Features
How the European right is pushing ICE -style operations in Europe
On 26 March, the European Parliament plenary endorsed a compromise text on the EU’s controversial new deportations bill (draft EU Return Regulation) that sealed a toxic alliance between centre-right and far-right forces.
With this vote, publicly elected MEPs are choosing to put hundreds of thousands of people, including children, at risk of irreparable harm. The text allows member states to detain children and adults, tear families apart, and send people to deportation centres in countries they have never set foot in. Five EU countries – Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Denmark and Greece – are already collaborating on plans to set up such centres, although no information is yet available about destination countries.
The proposals also grant sweeping powers to restrict people’s movements, search belongings, impose disproportionate “security” measures, and share personal data with countries that lack safeguards.
The Parliament’s position adds to an already harmful text, that is set to normalise and escalate ICE-style immigration enforcement across the Union. The Commission’s proposal would require member states to deploy broad and undefined detection measures to catch undocumented people, which could result in invasive surveillance, racial profiling and obligations for public workers to denounce undocumented people. More than 1,100 European healthcare professionals have urged MEPs to reject deportation-focused proposals, warning they could harm public health by turning hospitals into immigration enforcement sites. The Council’s position on the draft Return Regulation endorses police raids of public spaces and private homes, with very little safeguards.
This proposal is moving forward in a context that is already extremely hostile to migrants. European national border and police forces have been operating racialised checks, immigration raids, and violent deportations for years. All of this echoes ICE brutal immigration enforcement.
For instance, immigration raids are a mainstay across Europe too. Already in June 2025, the French minister for home affairs Bruno Retailleau deployed 4,000 police agents to carry out sweeping checks across bus and train stations, with the aim to arrest and detain undocumented people. In January 2026, the UK government boasted about “record” raids in nail bars, car washes, barbers and takeaway shops. In Belgium, the government is considering a proposal to allow police to raid private homes in search of undocumented people.
Police and border forces across Europe routinely profile and stop people based on the colour of their skin, clothing or religious symbols to check their papers, much like ICE agents have been found to do. In 2025, France was condemned for such practices by the European Court on Human Rights. In 2023, a Dutch court condemned and banned racial profiling as a profiling tool by Dutch border guards.
While immigration raids and other violent practices already exist in certain EU member states, embedding these measures in binding EU legislation would legitimise, expand and standardise them across Europe, turning exceptional or contested practices into the norm. It would encourage their spread to member states where they do not yet exist, and make them far harder to challenge or reverse.
We want to make this very clear: what we see in the US is already happening in the EU, and those practices risk becoming normalised and escalating here too.
The three key EU institutions – Commission, Council and Parliament – will now work to hammer out a final text. EU negotiators are sending a clear message: they are choosing repression, violence and harm over inclusion and community support – and the consequences will be felt in every clinic, school, neighbourhood and home across Europe.
Help us stop it.
Read more about this Regulation and what you can do in our factsheet.
Spread the word. Mobilise locally. Sign the petition.
⚖️ FORMER FRONTEX DIRECTOR INVESTIGATED FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. French judicial authorities have opened a criminal investigation into Fabrice Leggeri, the former director of the EU border agency Frontex and now a Member of the European Parliament for the far‑right Rassemblement National, for alleged complicity in crimes against humanity and torture. The probe follows a complaint filed by NGOs Ligue des Droits de l’Homme, Utopia 56 and Anafé, accusing him of tolerating or facilitating pushbacks and interceptions of migrant boats by Greek and Libyan authorities during his tenure at Frontex. Under Leggeri’s leadership from 2015 to 2022, Frontex dramatically expanded its operations amid mounting accusations of human‑rights violations at EU borders.
⛔ ITALY, DENMARK CALL FOR MIGRATION CONTAINMENT AMID WAR IN IRAN. Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen have called for increased EU coordination in response to potential migration linked to the war in the Middle East, framing mobility primarily as a risk to be contained. In a joint letter to EU leaders, they stressed the need to support populations in the region to prevent large-scale arrivals and to “ensure that the EU has full control of its external borders”. The initiative was presented ahead of a European Council meeting as part of broader discussions on migration policy.
🌎 NEW EU MIGRATION DEALS WITH NIGERIA, SENEGAL. The EU and Nigeria signed a new readmission deal for rejected asylum seekers in exchange of a €288 million funding package for Nigeria’s healthcare system. The Nigerian authorities have signalled their intention to deepen cooperation with the EU on migration, security, and economic development. The focus on migration control remains central, with Nigeria taking back rejected migrants in exchange for EU investment and market access.
The EU is also moving closer to a migration and investment pact with Senegal, following high-level talks in early March between EU commissioners for international partnerships and for migration, and Senegalese authorities. Border control remains the key focus, with increased maritime surveillance, patrol boats, and cooperation to prevent departures.
🔒 PORTUGAL TIGHTENS RULES ON UNDOCUMENTED MIGRANTS. The Portuguese government has endorsed a draft bill that aims to speed up deportation procedures and limit opportunities to regularise one’s administrative status. The reform would extend immigration detention from 60 days to up to 18 months, speed up deportation procedures, and lengthen entry bans. The proposal will need to be voted by the Parliament, amid concerns over the impact on migrants’ rights and access to fair procedures.
🗣️ SWEDEN: NEW PROPOSAL OBLIGES PUBLIC AGENCIES TO REPORT UNDOCUMENTED PEOPLE. The Swedish government has proposed new legislation that would oblige some public agencies and workers to report undocumented people to the police. The agencies that the Swedish government is targeting are: the Swedish Employment Agency, the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, the Swedish Enforcement Authority, the Swedish Pensions Agency and the Swedish Tax Agency.
Only days earlier, the government tabled a proposal that expands authorities’ ability to revoke a residence permit, including due to considerations about the person’s “lifestyle”. Both proposals are proposed to enter into force on July 13, 2026.
❤️ WHAT’S GIVING US HOPE THIS MONTH ❤️
The Spanish government has adopted a royal decree improving access to the public healthcare system for undocumented people living in the country. The measure removes administrative barriers that previously prevented many undocumented migrants from accessing medical care. Under the new rules, anyone able to prove they live in Spain can apply for healthcare at their local health centre and receive temporary coverage immediately while their application is processed. If there is no response from the local administration within that timeframe, the application will be deemed to have been approved.
The reform aims to ensure consistent access across all Spanish regions and reduce reliance on emergency services, while prioritising vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. The decree marks a significant step toward reinforcing the universality of Spain’s public health system and ensuring that healthcare is accessible to everyone living in the country, regardless of migration status.
Features
Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya
A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.
In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.
According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.
LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.
The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.
One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.
“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”
LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.
The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.
In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.
The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.
Features
Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years
The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.
“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”
In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.
Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.
“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.
The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.
Sudan tops the list
The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.
The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.
Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.
“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”
A decade of the same pattern
Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.
“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”
What NRC is calling for
The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.
NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.
“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.
Features
Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.
Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.
“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”
IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.
This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.
The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.
The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.
Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.
People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.
IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.
Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.
Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region.
IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.
While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.
-
News7 days agoWar has devastated life for millions of refugees, displaced
-
Features7 days agoStabilization gains open pathway to development in Central African Republic: IOM Chief of Staff
-
Features7 days agoNetherlands, IOM reaffirm partnership including new multi-year funding commitment
-
News Extra7 days agoWest and Central Africa urges more climate funding as displacement rises
-
Features4 days agoHaiti hosts over 1million displaced persons
-
News Extra7 days agoDiaspora remittances point to untapped potential in crisis response: New IOM report
-
News Extra4 days agoNigeria leads Liberia, Ghana, others as US set to deport migrants
-
Features2 days agoEbola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks
