Connect with us

Features

Europe is paying Libya to torture migrants on its behalf

Published

on

Migrant people and refugees await rescue by a civilian boat in the Mediterranean after setting sail from Libya | David Ramos/Getty Images
Kindly share this article

On a rescue ship in the Mediterranean, a survivor tells of their detainment in Libya, which the EU helped to support

By Melissa Pawson

Migrant people and refugees await rescue by a civilian boat in the Mediterranean after setting sail from Libya | David Ramos/Getty Images

The boat took us all by surprise that morning. It was spotted by a crew member on lookout on our top deck, and soon, what had been a pinpoint on the horizon quickly became a distinct wooden boat, tightly packed with people, all waving and shouting. No one was wearing a lifejacket.

The crew on our boat, Humanity 1, moved fast. I joined them on one of the lifeboats and watched as those being rescued clambered on board one by one – some laughing and smiling, others seemingly in a state of shock.

It felt like a toss of the dice that they’d been found by a German rescue vessel in the wide ocean of the central Mediterranean, one of the world’s deadliest sea crossings. They could just as easily have drowned or been picked up by the Libyan coastguard and sent to one of the country’s brutal detention centres.

This is a reality that one of the survivors, Omar*, knows all too well.

This rescue, in late November, was the seventh time the 18-year-old Egyptian had attempted to cross the Mediterranean in 2025.

On four of those attempts, Omar’s boat was stopped by the Libyan coastguard, while on another, in April, it was intercepted by the Tunisian coastguard, which “sold” those on board to Libyan authorities. Each time, Omar ended up being held in various Libyan detention centres, where he faced severe beatings, starvation, sleep deprivation, overcrowding and extortion for ransoms.

On this latest attempt, Omar believes he only made it so far because his smuggler paid the Libyan coastguard to allow them passage. In his 11 months of trying and failing to leave Libya for Europe, he said he encountered a network of smugglers, police, militia and coastguard all connected through bribes and corruption – all while the European Union turned a blind eye, and even supported Libyan border agents.

Over the past decade, the EU has paid Libyan authorities hundreds of millions of euros to block migrant people from entering Europe on small boats departing from North Africa. An initiative led by Italy – the target destination for most of those who make the journey – has provided further support and resources, including at least 14 patrol vessels.

The money comes after Italy ended its government-run search and rescue operation in the Mediterranean in 2014, after just one year, citing high costs and a lack of EU support. Since then, more than 22,775 people have died or gone missing on the route.

Civil rescue boats such as Humanity 1 have expanded their patrols of the waters in efforts to prevent loss of life, but are increasingly facing crackdowns from Libya, Italy and other European countries.

Libyan officials on board one of the Italian-donated boats opened fire on a rescue ship in international waters in August. Rights groups urged the EU to suspend support for the country’s coastguard after the attack, which they said was part of a broader pattern of aggression towards people in distress at sea and rescue crews.

Instead, Italy and the EU have doubled down on their support for Libya’s migration tactics. This week, after we arrived in Italy carrying Omar and the other survivors, Humanity 1 was detained by Italian authorities for not communicating with the Libyan coastguard. The organisation operating the vessel, SOS Humanity, said it suspended communication due to the Libyan agency’s track record of rights abuses at sea.

Marc Tilley, an independent migration researcher focusing on North Africa and the central Mediterranean, told openDemocracy that the EU is looking to expand its support for migration management in Libya, and the UK hopes to join them.

“The UK and the EU are now holding bilateral meetings with [Libyan commander] Khalifa Haftar in eastern Libya,” said Tilley. “This was the first exercise in legitimising eastern Libya [whose government is unrecognised] and recognising them as potential partners in their battle against migration.”

Held for ransom five times

In the six days we were both on board Humanity 1, I often spotted Omar listening to music and laughing with the other Egyptian and Somalian teenagers, the youngest of whom was just 15.

They could’ve been teenagers in any part of the world, except they happened to be on a rescue boat in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea, having escaped a place notorious for torture, forced labour and mass killings.

When I approached Omar on the deck and asked to interview him, I told him that I would need his informed consent to publish his story. He started laughing. “We’re not used to being respected like this, we’re used to being beaten in Libya.”

In March 2023, Omar was on his lunch break at a construction site in Cairo when he heard that his 15-year-old cousin had drowned off the Tunisian coast.

Omar, then 16, had last spoken to his cousin the night before to wish him a safe trip. The two teenagers were living in poverty in the Egyptian capital, Omar said, and planned to travel together to Libya and then find a boat to cross the Mediterranean Sea to Italy in search of a better life.

In the end, though, Omar was refused boarding on the flight to Libya from Egypt. His cousin made the journey alone. “I would’ve died with him,” Omar said.

survivors1-11

On board Humanity 1, Omar told of his repeated detainments in Libya | Melissa Pawson

Less than two years later, Omar decided to try again. “I left Egypt to find a better life,” he said. “I wasn’t afraid by what happened to my cousin.”

He found a smuggler to help him travel overland to Libya in January of this year, where he initially planned to stay and work. He had been recruited over Facebook to work in a sweet shop for 14,000 Libyan dinars a month (£1,900), but when he arrived, he was told he would only be paid the equivalent of £275 a month.

“I was threatened when I asked for my rights. I was cheated out of my salary,” he said. “I couldn’t go home. I felt I had to continue.”

Omar said that each time he attempted the crossing and was intercepted and imprisoned, he was forced to contact family members in Libya or back home in Egypt to beg them to pay for his release, with the ransom demanded by Libyan authorities ranging from 2,000 Libyan dinars (£274) to 16,000 dinars (£2,195).

The longest Omar was held for was 37 days, in the notorious Bir al-Ghanam detention centre. In the end, his father flew to Libya to pay the ransom, which secured his release. On other occasions, he turned to his cousins also living in Libya to help him find the funds to get out.

“We were 200 people crammed into a cell,” he said of his time in Bir al-Ghanam. “There was no room to even sit down. There were insects everywhere, and guards would come in at all times of the day to beat us with belts or throw water on us.”

He described how people in the cell would collapse onto each other because they were so weak from exhaustion and hunger.

“It was like that every time I was in prison,” said Omar. “But Bir al-Ghanam was the worst. I saw a lot of torture happening there. Some people had been there for over a year because they couldn’t afford the ransom.”

Bir al-Ghanam is an unofficial detention centre south-west of Tripoli, which Tilley said receives “even less scrutiny” than other sites and is known for its “horrific” conditions. “There’s no access, oversight or registration of the people who go there, so they are much more likely to disappear and to be extorted,” said the researcher.

The site has also been flagged by the US State Department’s country report on human rights practices for arbitrarily detaining migrant children.

A 2023 UN fact-finding mission reported found “overwhelming evidence” that migrants are “systematically tortured” in Libya’s detention centres, where “acts of murder, enforced disappearance, torture, enslavement, sexual violence, rape and other inhumane acts are committed in connection with their arbitrary detention”.

Salahadine Juma, a co-founder of activist group Refugees in Libya, has firsthand experience of what happens to those detainees whose families can’t afford to pay. “I was held in a [Libyan] detention centre for a year and a half. I was forced to do hard labour because I couldn’t pay the ransom,” he said.

Juma, who co-founded Refugees in Libya before arriving in France 18 months ago, said its hotline receives between 50 and 80 messages a day from trapped refugees and migrants asking for help to escape the centres. “They [Libyan officers] force them to pay a ransom, and if they can’t pay, they force them to work. Or, if they are women, they are sexually abused.”

Juma said there’s not much the group can do to help them, other than putting pressure on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ representatives in Libya. “But there are many stories of refugees and migrants being neglected by UNHCR in Libya,” he added.

Italy’s ‘deliberate obstruction’

The journey to Italy from the international waters north of the Libyan coast where we’d picked up Omar’s boat could be done in 13 hours, but it was six days before Humanity 1 finally reached the port of Ortona in central east Italy on 1 December.

During the long journey, many survivors on board asked why we had not yet reached Italy. At one point, we were so close to the shore we could see the details of buildings and wind farms – and yet we were still over 24 hours from arriving.

Since Italy’s adoption of the ‘Piantedosi decree’ in January 2023, rescue ships requesting a safe port to disembark rescued people have regularly been forced to travel to distant ports, sometimes over 600 miles away, or risk their boats being detained for non-compliance. Rescue organisations say the policy is a “deliberate obstruction” designed to limit their ability to rescue people in distress at sea.

When Omar and the other survivors eventually disembarked in Ortona, they were met by the Red Cross and Italian police. This moment marked the start of a new and challenging chapter for them – the start of their asylum processes in Italy. Those from countries that the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs have declared to be ‘safe’ (which includes Egypt) could face a fast-tracked detention and a deportation order.

Stefania, the protection representative onboard Humanity 1 said the dangerous sea crossing is “not the only challenge” the rescued people will have to face.

“Under Italian law, some categories are protected, for example, if you’re a victim of torture or trafficking,” she said. “[Otherwise] they could be detained in administrative detention centres [in Italy]. I don’t want to exaggerate but they could look like something they lived through in Libya.”

Bribes in one hand, EU salary in the other

For Omar, arrival in Italy also started the countdown for him to contact the Libyan smuggler awaiting payment.

“The money is due on arrival,” Omar told me before the boat docked. “As soon as I get on shore and have reception, I have to send the smuggler a message on Facebook to tell him I arrived. Then he’ll get in contact with my father to arrange payment.”

Omar owed the smuggler 360,000 Egyptian pounds (£5,650) for the crossing, which was due in full only if he arrived in Europe alive. “The smuggler told me that if the sum isn’t paid, he will kill any of my cousins or brothers in Libya,” said the teenager. “He told me he has contacts in Egypt and could hurt one of my family members there too. He knows who my relatives are, he’s observed me. The thing that matters to him is the payment.”

Omar has good reason to believe these are not empty threats. “The smuggler was always carrying his gun [while we were waiting to cross],” he said. “One time I picked up my phone to send a voice message on WhatsApp and he pointed his gun at me. He told me if you do that again, I will shoot you and bury you here.”

Omar described how most smugglers he interacted with during his time in Libya appeared to be connected to the Libyan internal police. “They have police cars, they’re wearing police uniforms and carrying the guns,” he said. “Those police pay money to the coastguard to get the boats through.”

This claim is difficult to verify, but likely has a measure of truth, according to Juma. “The majority of smugglers in Libya have some connection with the police or coastguard,” said the activist. “They know when the coastguard boats will be at sea, so they know which days to send boats. Some are even members of the coastguard themselves.”

Tilley told openDemocracy that Libyan internal police may not be smugglers “in the traditional sense”, but they could be seen as “facilitators” who turn a blind eye to smuggling, often in exchange for a financial incentive.

The 2023 UN fact-finding mission found “reasonable grounds” to believe that high-ranking staff in the Libyan Coast Guard, Libya’s Stability Support Apparatus and the Directorate for Combating Illegal Migration in Libya had “colluded with traffickers and smugglers.” The report stated that trafficking and smuggling generated “significant revenue” for individuals, groups and state institutions.

“The Libyan coastguard are border guards for Italy, not for Libya,” said Omar. “They get paid bribes by the smugglers, and they get their salaries from Europe.”

Mounir Satouri, a French MEP and chair of the EU’s Subcommittee on Human Rights, said the EU’s continuing support for the Libyan coastguard “only ensures that atrocities are committed in our name and with European taxpayers’ money.” He described the coastguard as “an uncontrollable armed militia that violates international law and tramples on human rights.”

“To tackle both militia abuses and smuggling networks, the European Union must coordinate genuine search-and-rescue operations and open safe pathways for those seeking refuge in Europe,” said Satouri.

“On 13 October, a boat carrying 140 people was attacked, leaving a man between life and death with a bullet lodged in his skull. Just last week, the rescue vessel Louise Michel was targeted. This is unacceptable. This impunity and Europe’s silence must end.”

A spokesperson for the EU Commission told openDemocracy: “Our position has always been clear: all parties to a search and Rescue operation must fully respect international law and international maritime law.“

Asked about the EU’s continued support and financing for Libya after Libyan authorities shot at a rescue boat in August, the spokesperson said: “Regarding this reported incident, the EU Delegation in Libya raised the incident in meetings with the Libyan authorities and urged them to take all necessary measures to ensure Libya’s full compliance with national and international obligations. The Libyan authorities informed that they are investigating the reported incident.

“We are fully aware of the challenges that migration management poses for Libya and other partner countries in the region. Our engagement in Libya has always been to support a comprehensive and rights-based migration management, including the protection of migrants, refugees and asylum-seekers in full respect of international standards and rules. That’s why, the EU is for instance, together with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, engaging in dialogue and providing trainings to improve operating procedures. This is key to address structural issues and produce long term changes. We are also looking into ways to support the Libyan authorities in strengthening their national monitoring and accountability procedures. Recent incidents show that this work needs to be further reinforced and there is a need to identify the best solutions to address the search and rescue incidents.”

“We provide training and capacity building to the coastguards on how to carry out their search and rescue operations in line with international standards and human rights. We also provide some equipment/infrastructure for the search and rescue operations. We indeed support their activities to improve them, but we don’t fund them. All this support never goes directly to the authorities, but is provided by implementing partners on the ground.”

Italian interior ministry was approached for comment.

When I asked Omar if there was anything he would like people to know about the journey, he said his only message was for others looking to make the crossing. “Don’t travel to Europe through Libya,” he said. “Find another way.”

*Name changed for security reasons

Credit: www.opendemocracy.net

Features

Un militant des droits humains tire à nouveau la sonnette d’alarme face à la prolongation de la protestation et aux préoccupations relatives aux droits à Agadez

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Yousef Ismail, membre de Refugees in Niger, a de nouveau alerté sur la situation humanitaire prolongée des réfugiés du camp humanitaire d’Agadez, au Niger, affirmant que leur manifestation pacifique se poursuit depuis plus d’un an et demeure sans solution.

Dans une série de publications, Ismail a indiqué que les réfugiés du camp manifestaient pacifiquement depuis 703 jours, réclamant une meilleure protection, la reconnaissance de leurs droits et l’accès à la protection internationale.

« La protection internationale est notre priorité », a déclaré Ismail, appelant la communauté internationale et les organisations de défense des droits humains à intervenir.

Il a décrit la situation dans le camp d’Agadez comme étant de plus en plus préoccupante et a accusé les organisations humanitaires ainsi que la communauté internationale de ne pas répondre suffisamment aux besoins des réfugiés qui, selon lui, ont fui leurs foyers à la recherche de sécurité et d’une nouvelle vie.

Ismail a exhorté les organisations internationales et de défense des droits humains à se rendre dans le camp afin d’évaluer directement la situation.

« La communauté internationale et les organisations de défense des droits humains doivent se rendre au centre humanitaire d’Agadez, où les réfugiés protestent depuis plus d’un an », a-t-il déclaré, avertissant que les réfugiés ont besoin d’une intervention urgente.

Il a également remis en question l’exactitude des déclarations faites par certaines organisations humanitaires concernant leur prise en charge des réfugiés vulnérables, affirmant que ceux bloqués à Agadez avaient, dans les faits, été abandonnés.

« N’abandonnez pas des personnes innocentes », a-t-il déclaré, soulignant que les réfugiés qui fuient des situations dangereuses devraient bénéficier d’une protection plutôt que d’être laissés dans une incertitude prolongée.

Six réfugiés auraient été expulsés vers la frontière tchadienne

Dans une autre publication, Ismail a commémoré ce qu’il a décrit comme une violation des droits humains survenue le 21 août 2025 au camp humanitaire d’Agadez.

Selon son récit, six réfugiés auraient été arrêtés puis expulsés vers la frontière avec le Tchad après avoir, selon les allégations, été déchus de leur statut de réfugié.

Il a présenté cet incident comme faisant partie de préoccupations plus larges concernant le traitement et la protection des réfugiés dans le camp.

Ismail a également attiré l’attention sur ce qu’il décrit comme la dégradation des conditions humanitaires à Agadez, réitérant son appel en faveur d’une protection et d’une intervention internationales.

Les publications ne fournissent pas de documents indépendants ni de réactions officielles des autorités nigériennes ou des organisations mises en cause par Ismail. Les allégations n’ont donc pas pu être vérifiées de manière indépendante sur la base des informations disponibles.

La prolongation de la protestation met en lumière des préoccupations plus larges concernant la protection des réfugiés et des migrants bloqués au Niger, notamment ceux qui recherchent une réinstallation, l’asile ou d’autres formes de protection internationale.

Continue Reading

Features

Rights activist raises fresh alarm over prolonged protest, rights concerns in Agadez

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A member of Refugees in Niger, Yousef Ismail, has raised fresh concerns over the prolonged humanitarian situation facing refugees at the Agadez humanitarian camp in Niger, saying their peaceful protest has continued for more than a year and remains unresolved.

In a series of posts, Ismail said refugees at the camp had been demonstrating peacefully for 703 days, demanding greater protection, recognition of their rights and access to international protection.

“International protection is our priority,” Ismail said, while calling on the international community and human rights organisations to intervene.

He described the situation at the Agadez camp as increasingly dire and accused humanitarian organisations and the international community of failing to adequately respond to the needs of refugees who, according to him, fled their homes in search of safety and a new life.

Ismail urged international and human rights organisations to visit the camp and assess the situation directly.

“The international community and human rights organizations must go to the Agadez humanitarian center, where refugees have been protesting for over a year,” he said, warning that the refugees urgently need intervention.

He also questioned the accuracy of statements made by humanitarian organisations about their treatment of vulnerable refugees, alleging that those stranded in Agadez had effectively been abandoned.

“Do not abandon innocent people,” he said, stressing that refugees fleeing danger should receive protection rather than being left in prolonged uncertainty.

Six refugees allegedly expelled to Chad border

In another post, Ismail commemorated what he described as a human rights violation that occurred on August 21, 2025, at the Agadez Humanitarian Camp.

According to his account, six refugees were arrested and subsequently expelled to the border with Chad after allegedly being stripped of their refugee status.

He presented the incident as part of broader concerns over the treatment and protection of refugees in the camp.

Ismail also called attention to what he described as the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in Agadez, reiterating his demand for international protection and intervention.

The posts did not provide independent documentation or official responses from Nigerien authorities or the organisations criticised by Ismail. The allegations therefore could not be independently verified from the information provided.

The prolonged protest highlights wider concerns surrounding the protection of refugees and migrants stranded in Niger, particularly those seeking resettlement, asylum or other forms of international protection.

Continue Reading

Features

Externalisation des frontières : l’activiste latino-américain Paulo Illes appelle à une alliance mondiale pour défendre les migrants

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Le président du No Borders Network, Paulo Illes, a appelé à la création d’une alliance internationale contre l’externalisation des frontières, avertissant que les gouvernements du monde entier transfèrent de plus en plus les responsabilités liées au contrôle des migrations au-delà de leurs propres territoires.

Illes a lancé cet appel lors du Forum social mondial qui vient de s’achever en République du Bénin.

Il a participé à une table ronde consacrée à l’externalisation des frontières.

Illes y a présenté la perspective latino-américaine sur la gouvernance des migrations et ses implications pour l’Afrique, l’Amérique latine et l’Europe.

Il a expliqué que, bien que les routes migratoires diffèrent selon les régions, les pays sont confrontés à une tendance politique similaire, caractérisée par l’expansion de politiques visant à empêcher les migrants d’atteindre leurs destinations finales.

Selon lui, la mondialisation croissante de l’externalisation des frontières exige une réponse tout aussi coordonnée de la part des organisations de la société civile, des communautés de migrants et des défenseurs des droits humains.

Illes a présenté le No Borders Network comme un réseau international de la société civile qui relie des organisations d’Amérique latine et de la péninsule Ibérique pour défendre les droits des migrants et des réfugiés.

Il a expliqué que l’externalisation des frontières en Amérique latine avait dépassé le cadre des contrôles frontaliers traditionnels pour devenir un système plus large de gestion de la mobilité humaine.

« En Amérique latine, l’externalisation des frontières revêt des caractéristiques particulières. Plus qu’une simple politique migratoire, elle représente un changement dans la manière dont les États gouvernent la mobilité humaine », a-t-il déclaré.

Illes a expliqué que les frontières devenaient de plus en plus des réseaux de mécanismes de contrôle répartis entre plusieurs pays, plutôt que de simples limites géographiques.

Il a identifié deux grandes dimensions de cette politique en Amérique latine : les efforts visant à contrôler les flux migratoires vers les États-Unis et les mesures destinées à anticiper les politiques européennes de contrôle des migrations.

Selon lui, plusieurs pays situés le long des routes migratoires ont assumé des responsabilités de confinement, rendant de plus en plus difficile pour les migrants d’atteindre leurs pays de destination.

Il a ajouté que l’externalisation s’opérait également par l’intermédiaire des aéroports internationaux, des régimes de visas, des procédures consulaires, du partage d’informations sur les migrations et de mesures administratives susceptibles de limiter l’accès à l’asile et à la protection internationale.

Illes a soutenu que ce qui était externalisé n’était pas seulement le contrôle des frontières, mais également la responsabilité de la protection internationale.

Il a déclaré que les pays de destination transféraient de plus en plus à d’autres États la responsabilité d’empêcher les migrants de poursuivre leur parcours et, dans certains cas, d’accueillir des personnes qui chercheraient autrement à bénéficier des systèmes internationaux d’asile.

Il a cité le Brésil comme exemple des contradictions entourant la gouvernance des migrations, soulignant que le pays disposait d’une législation migratoire axée sur les droits humains, de programmes de visas humanitaires et d’initiatives de parrainage communautaire, tout en subissant parallèlement la pression de la tendance internationale à contenir les migrations.

« L’externalisation prend différentes formes selon les régions du monde, mais ses objectifs restent les mêmes : repousser les frontières plus loin, rendre l’accès à la protection plus difficile et transférer les responsabilités internationales », a-t-il déclaré.

Résistance de la société civile

Illes a déclaré que la société civile organisée demeurait une source majeure de résistance à l’expansion des politiques d’externalisation.

Il a cité les mouvements sociaux, les universités, les Églises, les syndicats, les organisations de migrants et les groupes de la société civile parmi les acteurs qui développent des réponses alternatives aux politiques migratoires restrictives.

Il a indiqué que le No Borders Network travaillait à mettre en relation des organisations de différents pays, à partager des informations, à élaborer des positions communes, à mener des actions de plaidoyer politique et à renforcer les alternatives concrètes en matière d’accueil et d’intégration des migrants.

Selon lui, la résistance ne devrait pas se limiter à dénoncer les violations des droits humains, mais devrait également inclure l’élaboration d’alternatives viables.

« Notre stratégie n’est pas simplement de résister. Il s’agit de construire un autre modèle de gouvernance des migrations, fondé sur les droits humains, la solidarité et une responsabilité internationale partagée », a-t-il déclaré.

Il a appelé au renforcement des réseaux internationaux de la société civile, à la mise en place d’informations fiables sur les nouvelles formes d’externalisation des frontières, à un suivi permanent des violations des droits humains et à une action conjointe auprès des gouvernements et des organisations internationales.

Il a également plaidé en faveur de politiques d’accueil et d’intégration plus solides ainsi que d’une plus grande participation des migrants aux décisions qui affectent leur vie.

Appel à une alliance internationale

Illes a proposé que le Forum social mondial laisse un héritage concret en renforçant une Alliance internationale contre l’externalisation des frontières.

Selon lui, une telle alliance pourrait mettre en relation les organisations de la société civile, coordonner le plaidoyer politique, partager des informations, réagir rapidement aux violations des droits humains et élaborer des alternatives aux politiques de confinement des migrations.

« Les gouvernements ont déjà construit une architecture internationale pour contrôler la mobilité humaine. C’est maintenant à notre tour de construire une architecture internationale fondée sur la solidarité, la coopération et la défense des droits humains », a-t-il déclaré.

Il a également invité les participants à une conférence internationale prévue les 26 et 27 novembre à São Paulo, au Brésil, à l’occasion du 10e anniversaire du Forum social mondial sur les migrations.

Illes a indiqué que cette conférence chercherait à renforcer la coopération entre les organisations de la société civile, les mouvements sociaux, les chercheurs et les dirigeants de communautés de migrants engagés en faveur de politiques migratoires fondées sur les droits humains et la solidarité.

Il a averti que la criminalisation de la mobilité humaine se propageait dans différentes régions du monde, les migrants étant de plus en plus présentés comme des menaces, tandis que le confinement se substitue à la solidarité.

Selon lui, le débat devrait finalement dépasser la seule question des politiques migratoires pour aborder la question fondamentale de la mobilité humaine et de la protection de la dignité humaine.

« Si nous acceptons que la migration constitue une menace, l’externalisation apparaîtra toujours comme légitime », a-t-il déclaré.

« Mais si nous réaffirmons que la migration est un droit humain et que la protection des vies constitue une obligation internationale partagée, alors une autre forme de gouvernance des migrations n’est pas seulement possible : elle est nécessaire. »

Continue Reading

Trending