Connect with us

Features

All the new travel rules in Europe for 2026: Border checks, tourist taxes and behaviour crackdowns

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The UK's Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) is set to be enforced in 2026.

The UK’s Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) is set to be enforced in 2026.© ASSOCIATED PRESS

It’s set to be a bumper year for travel changes in Europe, with controls tightening around everything from borders to mass tourism.

To preserve the peace between residents and visitors, more destinations are introducing new rules and regulations impacting travel preparations, conduct and prices. As the EU continues to digitise its borders, tourists entering the bloc will face extra check

Here’s a rundown of some of the most significant trends and changes in Europe’s travel rules to expect in 2026.

Europe tightens border controls

EU Entry/Exit System (EES) completes rollout

The EU finally launched its new Entry/Exit System (EES) on 12 October 2025. The phased rollout is expected to be complete by 10 April 2026.

Rather than having their passports stamped, non-EU travellers crossing external Schengen borders will have to provide biometric data – including passport data, fingerprints and a facial image – electronically on entry.

The system will cover all EU countries except Ireland and Cyprus, as well as Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

The goal is to identify visa overstayers and combat illegal migration by verifying travellers’ identities, strengthening security checks, and maintaining a register of entries in EU databases.

Teething issues with the new system caused multiple delays to the launch throughout 2025, with the scheduled November launch at the UK Port of Dover stalled for car passengers until 2026 to prevent Christmas travel chaos.

While countries overcome this bumpy start, travellers should anticipate delays when entering some Schengen countries – though in the long run, the new system promises to streamline EU border checks.

ETIAS delayed until late 2026

ETIAS – the European Travel Information and Authorisation System – was initially due to launch following the EES in 2025, but has now been delayed until late 2026.

It will require visa-exempt tourists from certain countries to complete an online authorisation before entering the Schengen Area, at a cost of €20 to most travellers.

This will provide them with an electronic entry permit allowing for stays of up to 90 days within 180 days. The ETIAS is valid for three years.

UK Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) to be enforced in February

The UK’s Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) was soft-launched in October 2023 but has not yet been strictly enforced.

This will change as of February 2026, when tourists from 85 countries, who do not currently need a visa, will be required to apply for a digital permit for short stays in the UK.

The application currently costs £16 (€18.20) and is valid for two years on stays of up to six months.

Travel costs continue to rise across Europe

Travellers weren’t only been squeezed by permit fees and inflation in 2025: tourist taxesAirbnb crackdowns and other measures to curb mass tourism made exploring Europe more expensive.

Restrictions on short-term accommodation were announced in ParisBarcelona and beyond – primarily to combat inflated rent prices for locals living in popular tourist towns and cities.

This reduced the availability of cheap, Airbnb-style accommodation – and it’s set to continue into 2026. This January, Budapest became the latest to join the trend by introducing restrictions on short-term rentals in its bustling 6th District.

Pushing prices up further are nightly tourist taxes introduced in countries like IcelandSpainNorway and the UK– and even the continuation of the day-tripper fee in Venice, Italy. These measures aim to fund tourist infrastructure and prevent popular destinations from being overrun by visitors.

In 2026, Bucharest will introduce a nightly tourist tax despite backlash from hoteliers.

This all ties into a shift towards so-called ‘quality tourism’ in Europe, with many countries attempting to move away from mass, budget tourism and instead attract a smaller and more sustainable number of high-spending visitors.

Some destinations are passing on inflated operating costs to visitors. Snow sports enthusiasts have been particularly hard hit, with ski passes in Switzerland, Austria and Italy jumping by as much as 40 per cent compared to 2021 in some resorts due to soaring energy bills and maintenance fees.

Europe cracks down on badly behaved tourists

While cost-hiking measures serve a dual purpose of cutting visitor numbers and raising funds, other new rules are aimed more squarely at curbing undesirable tourist behaviour.

San Sebastián is the latest Spanish city to ban smoking on its beaches, while Portugal’s Albufeira last year announced fines for scantily clad tourists.

A recent ban on party boats in the Spanish port of Palma, meanwhile, aims to free up infrastructure and address noise complaints from residents.

In France, clampdowns start before tourists even touch down. As of last November, air passengers flouting rules or causing disruption on flights could face fines of up to €20,000 and even boarding bans for up to four years.

Passenger rights in 2026: What’s changing?

Rumours have been swirling about a crackdown on the money-grabbing antics of budget airlines. Europeans have been teased with the tantalising idea of fee-free cabin bags and better compensation for increasingly frequent flight delays.

But intense pressure from the aviation industry is putting the changes in jeopardy. An EU lawto improve air passenger rights has been under discussion for 11 years now – but airlines say the changes will inevitably result in ticket price hikes.

Some EU member states have even fought to reduce passenger rights by raising the three-hour compensation rule to four hours.

With no consensus reached on the issues, mediation talks are set to continue into early 2026.

A recent decision by low-cost airline Ryanair to stop accepting paper boarding passes has also raised rights concerns. One country, Portugal, has warned that the airline’s new measures risk non-compliance with air passenger rights.

Portugal’s aviation authority cautioned the airline that it cannot refuse passengers boarding with physical boarding passes.

CREDIT: AFRICANEWS

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.

In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.

According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.

LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.

The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.

One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.

“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”

LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.

The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.

In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.

Continue Reading

Features

Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.

“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”

In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.

Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.

“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.

The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.

Sudan tops the list

The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.

The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.

Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.

“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”

A decade of the same pattern

Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.

“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”

What NRC is calling for

The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.

NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.

“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.

Continue Reading

Features

Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks

Published

on

Health screening at Arua Airport in Uganda supported by IOM to support Ebola health surveillance and enhance early detection in the country. Photo Credit IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.

Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.

“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”

IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.

This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.

The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.

The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.

Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.

People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.

IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.

Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.

Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region. 

IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.

While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.

Continue Reading

Trending