Connect with us

Features

OPEN LETTER ON THE SITUATION AT THE UNHCR’S CAMP IN AGADEZ

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Children at the humanitarian center in Agadez raise banners during their 193rd day of peaceful protest.
Children at the humanitarian center in Agadez raise banners during their 193rd day of peaceful protest.

To the kind attention of

UNHCR Niger

Mr. Filippo Grandi

UNHCR High Commissioner 

Mr. Volker Türk

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

 Mr. Gehad Madi

Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants

Ms. Siobhàn Mullally

Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in persons, especially women and children

Ms. Mary Lawlor

Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human Rights Defenders

Ms. Alice Jill Edwards

Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

Dear UNHCR High Commissioner Mr. Filippo Grandi,

Dear United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Mr. Volker Türk, 

Dear Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment Ms. Alice Jill Edwards,

Dear Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants Mr. Gehad Madi,

Dear Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in persons, especially women and children Ms. Siobhàn Mullally,

Dear Special Rapporteur on the situation of Human Rights Defenders, Ms. Mary Lawlor,

With the present communication we aim to bring to your attention the critical situation in the humanitarian camp for asylum seekers and refugees, managed by UNHCR, located 15 km from Agadez in northern Niger, as well as the illegal deportation policies that are leading people into the camp.

As representatives of international civil society and local organizations working closely with asylum seekers and refugees, we have received numerous reports concerning the deplorable living conditions in the camp. We express our deep concern and urge you to take all necessary measures to address this situation.

The UNHCR refugee camp in Agadez: Refugee protests against degraded living conditions and lack of lasting and dignified solutions

For several years, UNHCR has been operating the humanitarian camp, primarily hosting individuals from Sudan and other war-torn countries, as well as others in need of protection.

The reports from camp residents regarding their living conditions are deeply alarming, highlighting severe shortages of food, inadequate medical care, and a lack of access to education for children. Pregnant women, the elderly, and children are particularly vulnerable to these harsh conditions. Beyond the immediate need for essential support, there are no long-term or sustainable prospects for the refugees residing in the camp. Some individuals have been living there for up to nine years, have not been granted asylum status, and remain unable to build an independent future for themselves.

From 2019, many protests were organized by camp residents:

  1. In July 2019, minor refugees from the Agadez camp started a march into the desert towards the border of Libya.
  2. From December 2019 until the beginning of January 2020, refugees from the Agadez camp assembled for a sit in protest outside the UNHCR office. This protest was ended by a police crack down and followed by facilities of the refugee camp set on fire. Several hundred refugees were arrested and 111 of them were sentenced in court, instead of providing solutions for the problems that had led to the protest.
  3. Since autumn 2024, this has come to a head in a wave of protests that continues to this day, triggered by a serious deterioration in living conditions. The voice of the refugees is the self-organised groups  “refugees in Niger” and “refugees in Tunisia”. 

As declared by UNHCR itself, they have been denied food vouchers for weeks in response for participating in the protests. While for the refugees, this means punishment for participating in a legitimate protest against unbearable living conditions, the UNHCR stated on 27 February that it had suspended the food vouchers at the request of the Nigerien authorities.

Recently, 8 refugees were arrested as reprisal for the protests.

Chain deportation practices and lack of lasting and dignified solutions

Asylum seekers and refugees residing in the camp come mostly from war torn countries, especially in Eastern Africa. Initially, these were primarily individuals evacuated from Libya (through the Emergency Transit Mechanism) or who had fled the country due to intolerable conditions, hoping to be resettled to safer countries thanks to the UNHCR’s assistance.  

In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that many asylum seekers are being trapped in the Agadez camp due to the pushback and deportation policies enforced by Niger’s neighboring states, which severely violate migrants’ rights.

For several years, tens of thousands of people have been illegally deported from Algeria to the border of Niger annually, with the highest number exceeding 30000 people in 2024. Besides Nigerien citizens who have allegedly been deported due to a readmission agreement between Algeria and Niger, many thousands of people from different African countries have also been deported in “non-official” deportation convoys. The latter are usually dropped off in the desert at the so-called “Point 0” about 15km outside the border village of Assamaka. 

Since 2023, Tunisian authorities have carried out mass arrests followed by the deportation of migrants and refugees to the borders of Libya and Algeria. The Algerian security forces often deport these individuals further to the border with Niger. These policies of managing migration are deeply flawed, both legally and ethically, as they involve forced, illegal, and violent transfers and are often legitimized by weak and ineffective humanitarian responses.

The majority of people in Niger live under socio-economic hardship, and the country is grappling with the impact of international sanctions and a security crisis caused by attacks from terrorist and armed groups. Despite these challenges, the vast majority of individuals stranded in the UNHCR camps in Agadez are denied the opportunity to be resettled to other countries, where they might have the chance to live in safe and dignified conditions.

The Case of Mr. K.

The situation of Mr. K., who has been in the Agadez center for eight months now, is emblematic of the senselessness and cruelty of the chain deportation practices between the Maghreb countries and Niger.

Like hundreds of other people, Mr. K. was in the spontaneous camp in front of the UNHCR and IOM offices in Tunis on May 3, 2024, when the Tunisian authorities forcibly evicted the people and deported them to the border with Algeria. Mr. K., along with a group of other people, submitted an individual complaint to the UN Human Rights Committee for the deportation he had suffered. The Committee ordered the Tunisian authorities to adopt precautionary measures to protect the deported people, who had managed to return to Tunis.

However, on the same day, Mr. K. and other men were arrested and, following the court-ordered release, were once again deported to Algeria and, after a few weeks, arrested and deported to Niger.

What We Are Asking For

In light of the situation described, the undersigned organizations make the following requests.

To UNHCR:

  • Cease all forms of intimidation and pressure on people who are legitimately and peacefully demonstrating to obtain adequate living conditions inside the camp and for a dignified future. 
  • Provide clear, timely, and accurate information to people in the camp regarding their situation and the real possibilities of durable solutions offered.
  • Ensure that the 8 people arrested as a result of the protests have full access to defense and due process and engage actively for their release from custody.
  • Exert the necessary pressure on destination countries to open appropriate resettlement channels.
  • Take a firm stance against the deportations carried out by the Tunisian and Algerian governments and contribute to raising awareness about these illegal deportations, avoiding providing humanitarian cover for such operations.

To OHCHR and the Special Rapporteurs:

  • Take a stand to ensure that the necessary work of the United Nations, its agencies, and bodies is not used to legitimize the deportation policies and serious human rights violations described.
  • Demand that the European Union and its Member States cease all forms of pressure on third countries of origin and transit of migration to adopt blocking and deterrence policies that produce the serious violations observed, and suspend all funding and support for such policies.

Sincerely,

  1. Refugees in Libya 
  2. Refugees in Tunisia 
  3. Alarme Phone Sahara
  4. ASGI
  5. Baobab Experience
  6. Migroeurop
  7. Forum Tunisien pour les Droits Économiques et Sociaux
  8. Sea-Watch
  9. Watch the Med – Alarm Phone 
  10. SmallAxe Odv
  11. Melting Pot Europa
  12. Novact
  13. Solidarités Tattes
  14. Migration-Control.Info
  15. Mission Lifeline International 
  16. Sea Punks e.V.
  17. Medico International 
  18. SOS Humanity e.V.
  19. The Tunisian Forum for Social Economic Rights – FTDES
  20. Mediterranea Saving Humans 
  21. Ya Basta! Bologna 
  22. MV.Louise Michel project
  23. Maldusa project
  24. Mendy for peace culture and DIversity Management
  25. OnBorders Oulx
  26. Beyond the Blue
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.

In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.

According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.

LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.

The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.

One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.

“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”

LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.

The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.

In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.

Continue Reading

Features

Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.

“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”

In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.

Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.

“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.

The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.

Sudan tops the list

The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.

The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.

Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.

“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”

A decade of the same pattern

Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.

“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”

What NRC is calling for

The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.

NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.

“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.

Continue Reading

Features

Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks

Published

on

Health screening at Arua Airport in Uganda supported by IOM to support Ebola health surveillance and enhance early detection in the country. Photo Credit IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.

Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.

“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”

IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.

This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.

The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.

The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.

Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.

People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.

IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.

Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.

Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region. 

IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.

While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.

Continue Reading

Trending