Connect with us

Features

Six die in seven days in the Channel

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Last week clearly showed how Channel crossings have become more dangerous during the past year, a report by Alarm Phone said.

The report said six people lost their lives in three different incidents (the most we’ve seen in a seven-day period), and survivors told associations in Calais still others may be missing at sea. Joint British and French efforts to ‘stop the boats’ played a major role in the severe overcrowding of the dinghies involved in these incidents. Each time rescuers were close at hand but, with 60, 72, even 86 people onboard a small eight-meter inflatable dinghy, they were unable to prevent deaths. These large numbers of people, most of whom have never met before and come from different countries and speak different languages, means they often don’t even know how many are in the dinghy or what happens to a family member or friend.

Most recently, on Thursday (18.07) night a dinghy with 86 people onboard set off from the French coast. According to the Prefecture Maritime­, the CROSS Gris-Nez tasked the Navy vessel P677 Cormoran to assist, but the people initially refused as they would have been taken back to France. At around 1am on Friday (19.07) the extremely overcrowded inflatable got into difficulty and the people then asked for help. When Cormoran’s rescue boat arrived, five people had fallen into the sea. They were immediately recovered, but when the rest of the people were being rescued one person was found unconscious inside the dinghy. He was taken to Cormoran but could not be reanimated onboard, nor by the medical team who evacuated him by helicopter. We now know he was a teenager from Sudan named Abdulaziz.

Slightly more than 24 hours earlier, on Wednesday (17.07) evening, a dinghy with 72 people shipwrecked on its way to the UK, approximately five miles north of Calais. According to the Prefecture Maritime, the dinghy’s sponson deflated and in a matter of minutes everyone was in the sea, many without life vests. A British Coastguard plane was observing overhead and the Cormoran, which had also been following this dinghy closely, launched its rescue boat. Both UK and French Coastguards immediately sent many rescue assets to the scene, including airplanes, helicopters and lifeboats. Despite the quick reaction, one woman from Eritrea died.

Less than one week before this, in the early morning of Friday 12 July, another dinghy shipwrecked just a few miles off of Cap Gris-Nez with over 60 people were onboard. The French safety vessel Minck observed its sponsons deflating and many people in the water. Again the Coastguard responded quickly, sending the Cormoran, a lifeboat, a helicopter and instructing a nearby fishing vessel to assist. Still, four people died in the incident. Identification is ongoing but it is understood they were young men from 4 Somalia.

We mourn those whose lives have been taken by this border – who are so young and have overcome so much before arriving to the North Coast of France. However, it would be a mistake to think about their deaths as merely tragic events. Nothing about them is inevitable and the shipwrecks are not caused by misfortune in an unforgiving sea. Instead, they are the outcome of a series of decisions made by the British and French states to enforce the UK’s border on the French coast and to constantly reinvest money and police resources to ‘stop the boats’. Under the rhetoric of ‘security’ and ‘saving lives’ governments have made crossing the Channel increasingly dangerous.

In the past twelve months, there have been more deadly incidents resulting from attempts to cross the Channel than in any previous year. Since August 2023, 32 people have now been killed and four people are still missing at sea from 14 separate incidents related to sea crossings, according to Calais Migrant Solidarity. Alarm Phone has attributed this to the intensified and often violent border policing on the French coast which has reduced the number of dinghies arriving to the beaches and which is creating chaos during launches. More dinghies are departing from France underinflated and overcrowded. Recently, a UK Border Force officer confirmed that their efforts to disrupt the supply of dinghies further upstream means the ‘loads are getting bigger’. The result, as we have seen in the last week, is that dinghies are failing more quickly with more causalities, as more people need to be rescued in each shipwreck.

We were also disturbed to observe on Wednesday 17 July that the British Border Force Ranger entered the port of Calais to return its 13 survivors to France. While the incident did occur in French waters, previously survivors of shipwrecks rescued by UK vessels had been brought to Dover, as on 12 August, 2023. The requirement in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 that asylum claims be made in a ‘designated place’ means that the UK Border Force officers onboard Ranger would have refused any asylum claims the people made. Those survivors, likely traumatised after the shipwreck, will now have to face the sea again on their journeys towards the UK.

What has become clear in the last year is that the increased search and rescue resources and coordination cannot prevent deaths in the Channel. More rescue vessels and quicker responses have made a big difference in these recent cases, but are also obscuring the true nature of the problem. At the same time they are proclaiming to be saving lives by preventing dangerous departures, the UK and French governments are taking actions which are directly causing more death and trauma on the shore and at sea. The fact that in each shipwreck there are comparatively fewer deaths than in, for example, 2021 allows them to fly under the radar, even be ignored. We cannot allow shipwrecks and death to become normalised commonplace occurrences at this, nor any, border.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.

In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.

According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.

LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.

The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.

One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.

“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”

LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.

The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.

In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.

Continue Reading

Features

Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.

“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”

In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.

Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.

“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.

The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.

Sudan tops the list

The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.

The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.

Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.

“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”

A decade of the same pattern

Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.

“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”

What NRC is calling for

The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.

NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.

“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.

Continue Reading

Features

Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks

Published

on

Health screening at Arua Airport in Uganda supported by IOM to support Ebola health surveillance and enhance early detection in the country. Photo Credit IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.

Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.

“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”

IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.

This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.

The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.

The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.

Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.

People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.

IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.

Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.

Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region. 

IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.

While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.

Continue Reading

Trending