News
UK offering £3000 to people refused asylum to relocate them to Rwanda
The Home Office is currently contacting some people who have been refused asylum in the UK to offer them £3000 to relocate to Rwanda, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) has said.
This, the JCWI said is separate from the Rwanda forced removals scheme commonly known as the ‘Rwanda plan,’ which targets people who are currently seeking asylum.
Many of the details of the scheme are still unclear, and we will update this document as the situation changes. Here is what we know so far:
What is the ‘voluntary departures’ scheme?
On 11 March 2024, the Home Office published its ‘voluntary and assisted departures’ guidance. The Government has for a long time had a scheme for people to “voluntarily” leave the UK to their home country if their asylum claim has been refused or if they would otherwise be deported. However, this can now include ‘voluntary departures’ to a third country, including Rwanda. This is a significant shift in policy. A similar scheme previously existed under the Dublin agreement when the UK was part of the EU. As far as we know, the Government currently only has a deal like this with Rwanda. However, the Government has repeatedly refused to publish its new agreement with Rwanda.
What is the £3,000 offer?
Under this policy, the Government can offer people money, supposedly to help them get settled in the new country. The Government has been calling people on the phone to offer them £3,000 to move to Rwanda under this deal. The offer is voluntary, which means people can say no. However, we are concerned that people who are not allowed to work or access the public safety net may feel less able to decline.
How is this different from the forced removals to Rwanda?
This is entirely separate from what has been called the Rwanda plan under the Rwanda Treaty / Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP). Under that plan, people who claim asylum in the UK but whose claims are deemed ‘inadmissible’ could be forcibly removed to Rwanda. See our explainer about the forced removals to Rwanda here. The voluntary scheme is separate, and the Home Office said it is currently only targeting people who have claimed asylum in the UK, had their claim heard here, but been refused. However, the Government has stated that people sent to Rwanda under the voluntary scheme will get the same benefits as those forcibly removed under the MEDP.
Who is targeted by the ‘voluntary departures’ scheme?
The Home Office has said they are targeting people whose asylum claims have been refused. However, we don’t know exactly what that means and if there are other criteria. It is not clear, for example, whether this includes people who have been refused asylum but have not yet appealed, or people whose claim is treated as withdrawn by the Home Office. The majority of asylum refusals are overturned on appeal, and there are cases where people’s asylum claims are wrongly treated as withdrawn e.g. if the Home Office sends a letter to the wrong address. We also don’t know how many people are being offered the scheme, because the Home Office refuses to publish that information.
What’s the problem?
The Government has not published its agreement with Rwanda, or details of any safeguards or independent monitoring of this scheme.
The Government has not published the criteria used to select people for ‘voluntary departure’ to Rwanda, nor the number of people offered this option.
The Government claims through the ‘Safety of Rwanda’ Act that Rwanda is a “safe third country”, despite the fact that our Supreme Court ruled in November 2023 that Rwanda is not safe, particularly for certain groups like members of the LGBTQI+ community.
We are concerned that the Home Office appears to be directly approaching people by phone, without outlining their options or rights in writing, or ensuring they have had appropriate language support or legal advice.
The Home Office has made no assurances that the people being made this offer are adequately informed of the safety risks in Rwanda.
This scheme raises serious ethical questions and we are extremely concerned that this will lead people to make decisions without the ability to provide full and informed consent.
While the Government has said that people sent to Rwanda are eligible for permanent settlement in Rwanda, it is not clear what immigration status people will have when they arrive.
What can I do?
If you are offered voluntary departure to Rwanda, YOU CAN SAY NO. DO NOT RESPOND OR SIGN ANYTHING UNTIL YOU HAVE LEGAL ADVICE.
News
New rescue vessel Aurora 2: Sea-Watch’s response to political blockades of civilian sea rescue
Sea-Watch is putting a new rescue vessel into service: With the Aurora 2, the organization is responding to the repeated detentions of civilian rescue ships by the Italian authorities. Now, Sea-Watch will remain operational even when one of its ships is detained. While one ship is blocked in port, the other will be available to carry out rescue missions. The far-right government’s strategy of limiting rescue operations through arbitrary detentions has therefore failed.
Julia Winkler, spokesperson for the organization Sea-Watch:
“Italy is detaining rescue ships to stop people from being rescued. With the Aurora 2, we are making sure this strategy fails. If one of our vessels is detained, the other will be ready to save lives. By expanding our fleet, we are fighting back against the far-right Italian government’s efforts to obstruct civilian search and rescue at sea.”
In the Mediterranean, speed is a matter of life and death. Every distress case is a race against time. That is why Sea-Watch operates not only the large vessel Sea-Watch 5 but also a smaller, faster ship—the Aurora. The Aurora reaches top speeds of up to 25 knots, allowing it to quickly reach people in distress at sea. With the Aurora 2, the organization is now specifically expanding its operational capabilities.
The acquisition of the Aurora 2 is a direct response to the far-right Italian government’s policy of systematically detaining civilian rescue ships. Since 2023, the Meloni cabinet has detained civilian sea rescue ships in port more than forty times. As a result, the entire civilian fleet has lost more than 900 days of operational time. The Aurora has also been blocked five times already. Italian courts subsequently overturned the rulings on several occasions. However, by the time the respective court decisions were issued, the Aurora had lost a total of 113 days of operational time.
With the Aurora 2, Sea-Watch is specifically countering this strategy. If one of the ships is detained, the other can continue to set sail and rescue people in distress at sea. In this way, the organization ensures its independence from bureaucratic blockades and guarantees the continuation of its rescue operations.
The detentions of civil search and rescue vessels are politically motivated and cost lives. The Mediterranean is one of the deadliest borders in the world. More than 34,000 people have been reported dead or missing since 2014. The actual number is estimated to be significantly higher. With its new ship, the Aurora 2, Sea-Watch can continue to quickly rescue people from drowning — even if one of its ships is blocked by the far-right Italian government.
Sea-Watch is part of the Justice Fleet, an alliance whose members are committed to upholding human rights and international maritime law. Its members refuse to comply with instructions provided for in the so-called Piantedosi Decree that conflict with international law and human rights obligations and are primarily intended to hinder rescue operations. As a result, their vessels are regularly detained by the Italian authorities. In recent months, Italian courts have overturned detention orders imposed on several Justice Fleet vessels in summary proceedings. Rulings on the overall legality of the Decree are still pending.
News
Sea-Watch strongly criticises EU response following attack on Sea-Watch 5

In response to the attack on the Sea-Watch 5 on Monday, 11 May 2026, the European Commission stated at its press conference on Wednesday, 12 May 2026, that EU cooperation with Libyan actors “prevented further violence.” Sea-Watch condemns this portrayal as a grotesque distortion of reality. Without the political, financial, and operational support of the EU, the so-called Libyan coast guard would neither possess boats nor the necessary infrastructure to operate at sea.
Julia Winkler, spokesperson for Sea-Watch:
“The EU has been working closely with actors in Libya for years, who are accused of committing the most serious crimes against people on the move, equipping them and enabling their operations at sea. Against this background, claiming that this very cooperation prevents violence is an absurd distortion of reality and is nothing short of cynical.”
A Commission spokesperson responded to questions regarding the violent attack on the Sea-Watch 5 on Monday, 11 May 2026, stating that it cannot be determined how many further attacks may have been prevented precisely due to consistent engagement (from 4:39). After the crew had rescued people in distress in international waters, Libyan militias opened fire and threatened to forcibly return the ship and those on board to Libya.
The attackers identified themselves as so-called Libyan Coast Guard. During the attack, the vessel involved was accompanied by the Murzuq 662 – a Bigliani-class ship handed over by Italy in June 2023 to Libyan actors as part of the EU–Libya cooperation framework SIBMMIL. Later the same day, the Sea-Watch 5 was also followed by the Ras Jadir 648, another vessel transferred by Italy to Libyan actors in May 2017.
Despite mayday calls being issued, neither Germany nor Italy, nor the EU naval mission EUNAVFOR MED IRINI provided assistance at sea on the day of the attack. On the contrary, on the same day the EU emphasised its intentions to expand cooperation and funding for Libyan actors in eastern Libya. These groups have been documented for years as responsible for torture, sexual violence, and kidnappings of people on the move. Without European support, such structures would not be operational in their current form.
For years, Sea-Watch and international organisations, including the United Nations, have documented serious human rights violations by Libyan militias and coast guard units with which they are closely linked. The political and legal responsibility of European actors is subject to ongoing international legal scrutiny. In 2022, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights filed a criminal complaint against senior representatives of the EU and its Member States for alleged crimes against humanity in connection with the EU–Libya cooperation.
News
Court annuls 20-day administrative detention imposed on Ocean Viking
SOS MEDITERRANEE has welcomed the recent decision of the Court of Chieti in Italy, which fully annuls the 20-day administrative detention imposed on the Ocean Viking in November 2023, together with the related fine and all associated sanctioning measures.
On 15 November 2023, Italian authorities detained the Ocean Viking in Ortona for 20 days and imposed a financial penalty under Decree Law No. 1/2023, known as the “Piantedosi Decree”. The case relates to a rescue operation conducted on 11 November 2023 in the Libyan Search and Rescue Region, during which our rescue ship rescued 34 people from a boat in distress after repeated unsuccessful attempts to obtain effective coordination from the Libyan maritime authorities.
In its first instance decision, the Court clearly confirmed that the Ocean Viking’s rescue operation was lawful, and that the captain “was faced with the necessity to intervene without delay” to protect human life. It also underscored the absence of effective coordination by the Libyan authorities, recognizing that the Ocean Viking was “the only vessel to intervene” to fulfill the duty to rescue at sea.
The judgment also reaffirmed that international maritime obligations under the UNCLOS, SOLAS and SAR Conventions prevail when human lives are at risk, and that sanctions cannot be imposed where state coordination is absent or inadequate. The decision recalls the Italian Constitutional Court’s ruling n°101/2025, which confirmed that national laws on sea rescue must comply with international law. In other words, no national law can be in contrast with the duty of saving lives at sea.
“This ruling confirms what we have consistently stated since November 2023: the Ocean Viking acted in full compliance with international maritime law and in the clear fulfilment of its maritime obligations,” said Soazic Dupuy, Director of Operations at SOS MEDITERRANEE. “Humanitarian rescue organisations must never be penalised for doing what authorities fail to do: ensuring timely and effective rescue for people in distress.” she concludes.
2026 is already among the deadliest years of the last decade. People continue to go missing at sea while the Italian government doubles down on efforts to prevent Search and Rescue NGOs from operating. This week, the Senate began discussing a new migration package that includes Provisions aimed at preventing Search and Rescue NGOs from entering Italian waters, yet another attempt to obstruct lifesaving operations.
On Saturday 16th, the captain of the Sea-Watch 5 was accused of facilitating irregular migration after completing a rescue operation following which the Libyan Coast Guard opened fire.
Despite repeated court rulings confirming the legality of civil rescue operations, Search and Rescue NGOs continue to face legal and administrative harassment for saving lives at sea. People in distress cannot wait for justice while lifesaving assistance is obstructed for political purposes.
-
News7 days agoWar has devastated life for millions of refugees, displaced
-
Features7 days agoStabilization gains open pathway to development in Central African Republic: IOM Chief of Staff
-
Features7 days agoNetherlands, IOM reaffirm partnership including new multi-year funding commitment
-
News Extra7 days agoWest and Central Africa urges more climate funding as displacement rises
-
News Extra7 days agoDiaspora remittances point to untapped potential in crisis response: New IOM report
-
Features2 days agoEbola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks
-
News Extra3 days agoNigeria leads Liberia, Ghana, others as US set to deport migrants
-
Features3 days agoHaiti hosts over 1million displaced persons
