Connect with us

News

Changes to UK visa and settlement rules after the 2025 immigration white paper

Published

on

Kindly share this article

On 12 May 2025 the government published a white paper policy document called Restoring control over the immigration system. The document proposed some changes to make it harder to move to and settle in the UK, with a view to reducing net migration.

A white paper does not, by itself, alter the law or the immigration rules. It puts forward changes the government intends to make in future. Some of the white paper’s proposals have been implemented since May, while others are still to come.

What changes did the May 2025 immigration white paper propose?

The document covered both high-level principles and specific policy changes. Among its many proposals, eight were detailed enough to be quantified: that is, civil servants included some rough illustrations of how much they might reduce net migration (PDF).

These eight proposals were:

Shortening the list of jobs for which employers can sponsor a worker from overseas for a Skilled Worker visa. Jobs assessed as being medium-skilled – RQF levels 3-5 – would not be sponsorable unless the Migration Advisory Committee recommends an exemption and the industry is demonstrating efforts to recruit domestically.

Ending an existing exemption for social care workers, so that employers would no longer be allowed to recruit them from abroad.

Exploring a levy on English universities’ income from international student fees.

Making it harder for universities to keep their licence to sponsor student visas by introducing tougher compliance rules.

Reducing the standard length of the Graduate visa, for international students to stay on and work in the UK, from two years to 18 months.

Stricter English language rules: higher standards for those already taking language tests, and requiring the partners of people moving to the UK on work visas to have basic English to qualify for a ‘dependant’ visa.

Increasing the standard qualifying period for permanent residence (also known as indefinite leave to remain or settlement) from five to ten years, with some people qualifying sooner based on criteria to be decided following public consultation.

Making it easier for people to come to the UK on certain visas aimed at highly skilled migrants, such as the Global Talent and High Potential routes.

Most of these changes can be made by amending the immigration rules. They do not require an act of Parliament, except for the levy on student fees.

The white paper is a wide-ranging document and covered many other issues as well. These included a new Labour Market Evidence Group, reforms to family and dependant visas, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and deportation of foreign national offenders.

Most questions from constituents have focused on the proposal to extend the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain (see below). There have been no changes in this area yet but the Home Office has begun its public consultation. The Home Affairs Committee of MPs, which is not part of the government, is also holding an inquiry.

When are the changes coming in?

There is no overall timetable for the white paper proposals to come into force. So far, the main relevant changes are:

An initial reduction to the list of jobs eligible for Skilled Worker visa sponsorship took effect on 22 July 2025. The revised list will be in place until the end of 2026; the Migration Advisory Committee is reviewing which medium-skilled jobs should be on the list beyond that.

Overseas recruitment of social care workers also ended on 22 July 2025.

Some liberalisation of the High Potential and Global Talent routes took effect in November 2025.

Looking ahead:

New applicants for Skilled Worker, Scale-up and High Potential Individual visas will need B2 English (a higher standard than the current B1) from 8 January 2026.

The changes to indefinite leave to remain qualifying periods are planned to begin in April 2026.

Graduate visas will only last 18 months if the person applies from 1 January 2027 (but 36 months if they have a PhD).

In addition, regulations to increase the immigration skills charge are due to come into force on 16 December 2025 following parliamentary approval.

Are people on a Graduate visa affected by the changes to Skilled Worker visa eligibility?

Yes.

Graduate visas do not require sponsorship but cannot be extended. Some people on a Graduate visa expected to transition from that visa onto a sponsored Skilled Worker visa, potentially with their existing employer.

If that person’s occupation was removed from the Skilled Worker eligibility list in July 2025, that option is no longer available. This has affected Graduate visa holders in medium-skilled jobs in sectors such as transport, dentistry and prisons.

Will migrants have to wait ten years for indefinite leave to remain?

The government announced more details of this proposal on 20 November 2025. The ‘baseline’ qualifying period for many migrants would be ten years, but some people will be able to qualify sooner and others will take longer. The qualifying periods will now depend much more on each person’s individual circumstances.

For example, people in higher-skilled jobs who earn over £50,270 or work in public sector healthcare and education roles would still qualify after five years. Volunteering in the community would allow indefinite leave after five to seven years. But those working in medium-skilled jobs would take up to 15 years, refugees would take 20 years (unless arriving by resettlement programmes), and non-refugees who secured their visa after illegal entry or overstaying would take up to 30 years. Others would not qualify at all, including if they have not earned £12,570 for three to five years (and do not have an “alternative amount of income”).

This is all subject to the consultation that runs until 12 February 2026.

Which visa categories will be affected by the longer qualifying periods?

People with post-Brexit residence rights under the EU Settlement Scheme are entirely “out of scope” of the changes.

In addition, partners of British citizens and people on the Hong Kong BNO visa would continue to qualify for settlement after five years. But they would need to have the £12,570 minimum earnings and meet the other new “minimum mandatory requirements” such as B2 English (see page 24 of the consultation document).

The consultation asks for views on whether other groups, such as victims of domestic abuse and children who grew up in the UK, should also remain at five years.

This means that people on Skilled Worker and dependant visas, with refugee status, or who currently qualify based on long residence are among those affected.

Will people already in the UK be affected by the settlement changes?

The consultation says “we propose to apply these changes to everyone in the country today who has not already received indefinite leave to remain. This would mean that those who are due to reach settlement in the coming months and years would be subject to the new requirements for earned settlement, as soon as our immigration rules have changed”. The Home Secretary told MPs that the immigration rules will begin to change from April 2026.

This is subject to the final outcome of the consultation, which invites views on whether there should be “transitional arrangements” to exempt some people already in the UK. The accompanying press release suggests that this might be considered for “borderline cases”.

Will there be changes to settlement rules apart from the qualifying periods?

Yes. As immigration lawyer Nick Rollason has said, this would be the biggest overhaul of the UK’s legal migration model for 50 years (leaving Brexit aside).

For example, the consultation says that accompanying partners of people on work visas will now need qualify for indefinite leave to remain in their own right rather than alongside their sponsor. It also suggests that those granted indefinite leave to remain will no longer gain access to the welfare system as a result – they would stay on ‘no recourse to public funds‘ – with the right to claim benefits restricted to British citizens.

Will MPs be voting on the white paper changes?

Unlikely, in most cases. Revision of visa and settlement regulations is done through statements of changes to the immigration rules. A statement of changes takes effect automatically, without a vote being necessary.

To reject the changes, MPs must approve a motion expressing disapproval of the new rules within 40 days. Some MPs tabled such a motion in relation to the July 2025 statement of changes connected to the white paper, but the government is not obliged to allow a debate or vote on the motion. There was no House of Commons vote on the Conservative government’s significant changes to visa rules in 2024.

There may however be non-binding debates which do not involve a motion to disapprove the rules. MPs held such a debate on 8 September 2025.

Certain elements of the white paper proposals, such as the levy on international student fees and changes to naturalisation law, do require an act of Parliament and therefore the endorsement of MPs.

Culled from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10267/

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

New rescue vessel Aurora 2: Sea-Watch’s response to political blockades of civilian sea rescue

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Sea-Watch is putting a new rescue vessel into service: With the Aurora 2, the organization is responding to the repeated detentions of civilian rescue ships by the Italian authorities. Now, Sea-Watch will remain operational even when one of its ships is detained. While one ship is blocked in port, the other will be available to carry out rescue missions. The far-right government’s strategy of limiting rescue operations through arbitrary detentions has therefore failed.

Julia Winkler, spokesperson for the organization Sea-Watch:

“Italy is detaining rescue ships to stop people from being rescued. With the Aurora 2, we are making sure this strategy fails. If one of our vessels is detained, the other will be ready to save lives. By expanding our fleet, we are fighting back against the far-right Italian government’s efforts to obstruct civilian search and rescue at sea.”

In the Mediterranean, speed is a matter of life and death. Every distress case is a race against time. That is why Sea-Watch operates not only the large vessel Sea-Watch 5 but also a smaller, faster ship—the Aurora. The Aurora reaches top speeds of up to 25 knots, allowing it to quickly reach people in distress at sea. With the Aurora 2, the organization is now specifically expanding its operational capabilities.

The acquisition of the Aurora 2 is a direct response to the far-right Italian government’s policy of systematically detaining civilian rescue ships. Since 2023, the Meloni cabinet has detained civilian sea rescue ships in port more than forty times. As a result, the entire civilian fleet has lost more than 900 days of operational time. The Aurora has also been blocked five times already. Italian courts subsequently overturned the rulings on several occasions. However, by the time the respective court decisions were issued, the Aurora had lost a total of 113 days of operational time.

With the Aurora 2, Sea-Watch is specifically countering this strategy. If one of the ships is detained, the other can continue to set sail and rescue people in distress at sea. In this way, the organization ensures its independence from bureaucratic blockades and guarantees the continuation of its rescue operations.

The detentions of civil search and rescue vessels are politically motivated and cost lives. The Mediterranean is one of the deadliest borders in the world. More than 34,000 people have been reported dead or missing since 2014. The actual number is estimated to be significantly higher. With its new ship, the Aurora 2, Sea-Watch can continue to quickly rescue people from drowning — even if one of its ships is blocked by the far-right Italian government.

Sea-Watch is part of the Justice Fleet, an alliance whose members are committed to upholding human rights and international maritime law. Its members refuse to comply with instructions provided for in the so-called Piantedosi Decree that conflict with international law and human rights obligations and are primarily intended to hinder rescue operations. As a result, their vessels are regularly detained by the Italian authorities. In recent months, Italian courts have overturned detention orders imposed on several Justice Fleet vessels in summary proceedings. Rulings on the overall legality of the Decree are still pending.

Continue Reading

News

Sea-Watch strongly criticises EU response following attack on Sea-Watch 5

Published

on

Kindly share this article

In response to the attack on the Sea-Watch 5 on Monday, 11 May 2026, the European Commission stated at its press conference on Wednesday, 12 May 2026, that EU cooperation with Libyan actors “prevented further violence.” Sea-Watch condemns this portrayal as a grotesque distortion of reality. Without the political, financial, and operational support of the EU, the so-called Libyan coast guard would neither possess boats nor the necessary infrastructure to operate at sea.



Julia Winkler, spokesperson for Sea-Watch:

“The EU has been working closely with actors in Libya for years, who are accused of committing the most serious crimes against people on the move, equipping them and enabling their operations at sea. Against this background, claiming that this very cooperation prevents violence is an absurd distortion of reality and is nothing short of cynical.”

A Commission spokesperson responded to questions regarding the violent attack on the Sea-Watch 5 on Monday, 11 May 2026, stating that it cannot be determined how many further attacks may have been prevented precisely due to consistent engagement (from 4:39). After the crew had rescued people in distress in international waters, Libyan militias opened fire and threatened to forcibly return the ship and those on board to Libya.

The attackers identified themselves as so-called Libyan Coast Guard. During the attack, the vessel involved was accompanied by the Murzuq 662 – a Bigliani-class ship handed over by Italy in June 2023 to Libyan actors as part of the EU–Libya cooperation framework SIBMMIL. Later the same day, the Sea-Watch 5 was also followed by the Ras Jadir 648, another vessel transferred by Italy to Libyan actors in May 2017.

Despite mayday calls being issued, neither Germany nor Italy, nor the EU naval mission EUNAVFOR MED IRINI provided assistance at sea on the day of the attack. On the contrary, on the same day the EU emphasised its intentions to expand cooperation and funding for Libyan actors in eastern Libya. These groups have been documented for years as responsible for torture, sexual violence, and kidnappings of people on the move. Without European support, such structures would not be operational in their current form.

For years, Sea-Watch and international organisations, including the United Nations, have documented serious human rights violations by Libyan militias and coast guard units with which they are closely linked. The political and legal responsibility of European actors is subject to ongoing international legal scrutiny. In 2022, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights filed a criminal complaint against senior representatives of the EU and its Member States for alleged crimes against humanity in connection with the EU–Libya cooperation.

Continue Reading

News

Court annuls 20-day administrative detention imposed on Ocean Viking

Published

on

Kindly share this article

SOS MEDITERRANEE has welcomed the recent decision of the Court of Chieti in Italy, which fully annuls the 20-day administrative detention imposed on the Ocean Viking in November 2023, together with the related fine and all associated sanctioning measures.

On 15 November 2023, Italian authorities detained the Ocean Viking in Ortona for 20 days and imposed a financial penalty under Decree Law No. 1/2023, known as the “Piantedosi Decree”. The case relates to a rescue operation conducted on 11 November 2023 in the Libyan Search and Rescue Region, during which our rescue ship rescued 34 people from a boat in distress after repeated unsuccessful attempts to obtain effective coordination from the Libyan maritime authorities.

In its first instance decision, the Court clearly confirmed that the Ocean Viking’s rescue operation was lawful, and that the captain “was faced with the necessity to intervene without delay” to protect human life. It also underscored the absence of effective coordination by the Libyan authorities, recognizing that the Ocean Viking was “the only vessel to intervene” to fulfill the duty to rescue at sea.

The judgment also reaffirmed that international maritime obligations under the UNCLOS, SOLAS and SAR Conventions prevail when human lives are at risk, and that sanctions cannot be imposed where state coordination is absent or inadequate. The decision recalls the Italian Constitutional Court’s ruling n°101/2025, which confirmed that national laws on sea rescue must comply with international law. In other words, no national law can be in contrast with the duty of saving lives at sea.

“This ruling confirms what we have consistently stated since November 2023: the Ocean Viking acted in full compliance with international maritime law and in the clear fulfilment of its maritime obligations,” said Soazic Dupuy, Director of Operations at SOS MEDITERRANEE. “Humanitarian rescue organisations must never be penalised for doing what authorities fail to do: ensuring timely and effective rescue for people in distress.” she concludes.

2026 is already among the deadliest years of the last decade. People continue to go missing at sea while the Italian government doubles down on efforts to prevent Search and Rescue NGOs from operating. This week, the Senate began discussing a new migration package that includes Provisions aimed at preventing Search and Rescue NGOs from entering Italian waters, yet another attempt to obstruct lifesaving operations.

On Saturday 16th, the captain of the Sea-Watch 5 was accused of facilitating irregular migration after completing a rescue operation following which the Libyan Coast Guard opened fire.

Despite repeated court rulings confirming the legality of civil rescue operations, Search and Rescue NGOs continue to face legal and administrative harassment for saving lives at sea. People in distress cannot wait for justice while lifesaving assistance is obstructed for political purposes.

Continue Reading

Trending