Connect with us

Features

2,310 Nigerians removed from US in 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

2,310 Nigerians have been removed from USA by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement between 2014 and 2024.

A review of the agency’s annual reports and appendices, according a report by The Punch also revealed that 20 removals have been recorded so far in 2025, bringing the total since 2014 to 2,330, with 3,690 more remaining under watch.

The year-by-year figures are drawn from ICE’s 2014, 2015 and 2016 statistical reports, the 2018 Enforcement and Removal Operations report, and the 2024 Annual Report’s country-by-country appendix, which captures figures from 2019.

Across the 11 years, Sunday PUNCH notes that Nigerian removals fell by roughly 47.1%, from 261 in 2014 to 138 in 2024.

The trend has dwindled over the years, as ICE removed 261 Nigerians in 2014, 224 in 2015 and 242 in 2016.

The number rose in 2017 (312) and 2018 (369) before easing in 2019 (286) and 2020 (199).

Post-COVID constraints led to a significant decline in removals, with numbers plummeting to 78 in 2021 and 49 in 2022.

However, it rebounded in 2023 (152) and plateaued at 138 in 2024. This resulted in the removal of 2,310 Nigerians between 2014 and 2024.

Although removals fell from 286 Nigerians in 2019 to 138 in 2024—a 51.7 per cent decline over the six years—ICE’s country-by-country deportation ledger showed that Nigerian removals spiked during Donald Trump’s first two full years in office, 2018 and 2019, and are expected to rise under a renewed crackdown.

Across Africa, ICE data show Nigeria with the largest total removals over the period, followed by Somalia (1,539), Ghana (1,380), Senegal (1,122), Kenya (858), Egypt (771), Liberia (632), Guinea (626), Mauritania (611), Democratic Republic of the Congo (508), Cameroon (475), Gambia (399), Morocco (376), Angola (348), Ethiopia (328), Sierra Leone (309), and South Africa (288).

Eritrea also follows with 285, Ivory Coast/Côte d’Ivoire (243), Cape Verde (234), Mali (219), South Sudan (199), Burkina Faso (163), Tanzania (137), Sudan (131), Algeria (120), Uganda (118), Guinea-Bissau (107), Benin (93), Zimbabwe (91), Niger (85), Djibouti (67), Tunisia (66), Rwanda (65), Seychelles (63), Equatorial Guinea (61), Gabon (60), Mozambique (55), Zambia (53), Lesotho (47), Namibia (42), Burundi (41), Botswana (39), Eswatini/Swaziland (37), Chad (36), The Comoros (28).

Meanwhile, several others, including Madagascar (3), São Tomé and Príncipe (1), Somaliland and Eritrea saw single- or low-single-digit removals.

Globally, Mexico accounted for the single largest volume of removals, with approximately 907,748 removals over the 11 years, followed by Guatemala (307,325), Honduras (225,347), and El Salvador (134,906). Colombia followed with 34,215 removals, Ecuador (30,816), Dominican Republic (19,961), Nicaragua (17,989), Peru (14,159) and Brazil (13,529).

The report attributed the spike to the Electronic Nationality Verification expansion programme, which shortened the paperwork cycle by allowing consular officers to clear identity checks electronically rather than in person.

Officials say the ENV cut manifest approval times from weeks to days and allowed weekend-chartered flights to countries such as Mauritania, Senegal, and Ghana.

Since the first tenure of Trump, the ICE reports show at least 1,166 Nigerians removed in 2017–2020 (312 in 2017, 369 in 2018, 286 in 2019 and 199 in 2020).

From 2024 to date, the count stands at about 158.

According to ICE’s current count, about 20 Nigerian removals have been recorded as of January 2025.

The agency says the figures remain preliminary and will be updated periodically as case outcomes are confirmed.

In January 2017, Trump signed Executive Order 13768, which broadened ICE’s enforcement to include anyone without lawful status.

ICE arrest numbers jumped 30 per cent that year as Nigerian removals rose accordingly.

In 2019, ICE carried out 267,258 removals, the highest yearly total in nearly a decade. That year, the number of Nigerian removals rose to 286.

This was part of a long list of 3,690 Nigerians whom ICE had identified and placed on its non-detained docket by late 2020, as revealed in January 2025.

Nigeria had the second-highest number of nationals facing deportation in Africa at the time, after Somalia’s 4,090 cases.

In 2021, President Joe Biden directed ICE to prioritise the most serious criminals and recent entrants for removal, leading to a sharp drop in deportation numbers.

ICE removals fell to about 59,000 in 2021, the lowest in decades, and Nigerian removals dropped to 78 that year.

The following year, even fewer Nigerians (49) were sent home amid pandemic-related travel restrictions and continued cautious enforcement.

But a Supreme Court ruling in July 2024 allowed the Department of Homeland Security to fully reinstate those guidelines, prioritising public safety and national security cases.

ICE defines “removal” as the confirmed compulsory movement of a non-citizen out of the United States following an order of removal.

Under U.S. law, deportation or “removal” can be carried out only after confirmation that a non-citizen is inadmissible or deportable. Grounds for deportation include certain criminal convictions, fraud and misrepresentation; security and terrorism concerns; immigration violations such as unlawful presence and illegal entry; and specific conduct like marriage fraud or false claims to citizenship.

This often follows a final removal order issued by an immigration judge or administratively, via mechanisms such as expedited removal at the border.

Once an order of removal is final, ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division must secure travel documents, field medical clearances and book a commercial seat or, more commonly for West-African returns, a dedicated charter flight.

The agency says electronic verification has shaved days off that timeline, which explains the surge in removals in 2024.

In carrying out Trump’s recent deportation order, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have raided several establishments suspected of harbouring illegal immigrants and made arrests.

At a meeting with US Ambassador to Nigeria, Richard Mills Jr., in February 2025, Nigeria’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, called on the United States to ensure a humane deportation process for Nigerians.

“We are asking as a country whether they will be given ample time to handle their assets or will they just be bundled into planes and repatriated?” she queried, highlighting concerns over the emotional and financial impact on deportees and their families.

She argued that deportations, particularly for persons with no history of violent crime, should not be traumatic or abrupt.

The Nigerians in Diaspora Commission has earlier said it is ready to welcome Nigerians deported from the US.

“The Federal Government has set up an inter-agency committee, comprising the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, NiDCOM, Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Office of the National Security Adviser, should there be mass deportation of Nigerians from the US,” NiDCOM’s Director of Media and Corporate Affairs, Abdur-Rahman Balogun, said in an interview.

Features

Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.

In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.

According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.

LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.

The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.

One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.

“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”

LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.

The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.

In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.

Continue Reading

Features

Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.

“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”

In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.

Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.

“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.

The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.

Sudan tops the list

The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.

The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.

Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.

“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”

A decade of the same pattern

Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.

“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”

What NRC is calling for

The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.

NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.

“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.

Continue Reading

Features

Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks

Published

on

Health screening at Arua Airport in Uganda supported by IOM to support Ebola health surveillance and enhance early detection in the country. Photo Credit IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.

Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.

“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”

IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.

This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.

The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.

The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.

Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.

People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.

IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.

Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.

Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region. 

IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.

While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.

Continue Reading

Trending