Features
After Civil Fleet’s FOI, Home Office ordered to release data on five dead people
A recent release by Civil Fleet, a news blog and podcast focused on the activist-led refugee rescue and support missions in the Mediterranean and across Fortress Europe, says the Home Office has been ordered to release information it sought to keep secret regarding the at least five people who died in its asylum-seeker accommodation in the first six months of 2023.
A four-month investigation by the Information Commissioner’s Office found that the Home Office’s arguments to withhold the information don’t hold up, and that it must disclose the information by April 4.
In July 2023, The Civil Fleet sent a Freedom of Information Request (FOI) to the Home Office asking the following:
1) The number of asylum seekers who died in Home Office accommodation between 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2023.
2) The cause and location of each death, as well as their ages, nationalities, and gender.
The Home Office answered the first question in full.
foi-77208-annex-1Download
According to its data at the time, five people died in the Home Office’s outsourced asylum-seeker accommodation in the first six months of 2023.
Suicide was listed as the cause of death for one of the deceased. This happened in March in the Northwest of England. The Home Office’s accommodation there is run by Serco.
The rest of the deaths were listed as “cause to be confirmed.”
Two people died in accommodations in the South of England, which are run by Clearsprings Ready Homes. One died in April; the other in June.
One person died in March while housed by Serco in the Midlands and East of England.
Another person died in March in Scotland, where Mears Group has been outsourced to run asylum-seeker accommodation.
“It’s been three years since the current asylum policy of refusing to take responsibility for tens of thousands of people’s claims began, but the government still appears to have nothing in place to monitor the true impact of this dire policy,” Amnesty International UK’s refugee and migrant rights director Steve Valdez-Symonds told The Civil Fleet.
“With a substantial rise in fatalities in the asylum system already identified, a bare minimum response would have been to record and assess the number and circumstances of these deaths.
“But ministers have chosen not to do that. They do not want to know – or want anyone else to know – the true costs, including to human life, of the policy they keep ratcheting up rather than ever face the fact that it is doing enormous harm.
“The consequences are already utterly dreadful and the longer this continues, the more lives will be ruined, even lost, to a miserable determination on the part of government to simply refuse to fairly and efficiently decide the claims that people make.”
Ann Salter, Freedom from Torture’s head of clinical services northwest, told The Civil Fleet that many of the asylum-seekers who receive clinical treatment with the organisation live in unsafe and unsuitable accommodation – “whether that’s in a hotel, self-contained unit, shared housing or even a shared room.
“Every day we see first-hand the impact that poor quality and hazardous housing has on survivors of torture – cold and damp conditions exacerbate physical harm caused by torture, and unhygienic and mouldy environments can lead to survivors feeling unsafe and so can trigger PTSD symptoms.
“For those who’ve just arrived in the UK and are trying to rebuild their lives, dangerous accommodation can compound an already difficult road to recovery.
“The government must urgently take steps to make sure that survivors and other refugees are housed in decent homes within our communities, where they have proper access to healthcare and other vital services.”
The Home Office’s arguments
The Home Office refused to provide the ages, nationalities and gender of the deceased, despite doing so in 2021, 2022 and early 2023.
Data provided from those requests showed that 46 people died while housed at Home Office asylum-seeker accommodation in 2022 — more than double the 19 deaths in 2021.
In fact, 22 people died in the Home Office’s care in the first six months of 2022 — more than in the whole of 2021.
Excluding five newborn babies, the average age of all those who died in 2022 was 45.2 years old, at a rate of 3.8 deaths per month.
The average age of those who died in 2021 was 40.3 years, with 1.5 deaths per month.
The Home Office justified its decision to keep the information secret this time by citing Section 38(1)(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
That section of the FOIA states that information can be exempt from disclosure if its release “would, or would likely, endanger the physical or mental health of any individual,” or “endanger the safety of any individual.”
The Home Office added that disclosing the ages, nationalities, and gender of those who died in its asylum-seeker accommodation could “identify the deceased and, by association, any family members and other asylum seekers.
“We believe that disclosure of this information would or would be likely to have a detrimental effect on the physical or mental health of any individual and could endanger the safety of any individual.”
The Home Office’s internal review determined in October that the original response was correct. [The Home Office says it aims to complete internal reviews within 20 working day, but this took 57.]
“I have determined that sections 38(1)(a) and (b) have been applied correctly in this instance,” the internal review said.
“I agree with the [original] decision that the balance of the public interest identified lies in favour of non-disclosure of the details relating to the deceased asylum seekers.
“This is because the overall public interest lies in protecting the families of the deceased individuals.”
In response to the Home Office deciding not to provide the ages, nationalities and gender of the dead this time (despite having done so on three prior occasions), the internal reviewer simply said: “Each request must be considered on a case by case basis.”
Enter the ICO
Later in October, The Civil Fleet filed a complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
ic-258210-g2b4-decision-noticeDownload
The ICO’s decision notice, delivered on February 29, revealed that a reconsideration of the Home Office’s “handling of High Profile Notifications, in relation to asylum seekers and related requests made under the FOIA, took place in spring 2023.”
“This included a review of requests relating to deaths of asylum seekers. It explained that a decision was made to adopt a more risk-based approach to the disclosure of additional ‘identifier’ information in relation to deceased persons, based on legal advice and advice from information rights practitioners.”
The Home Office explained to the ICO that “each request is still considered individually on its merits, but it does not disclose detailed information about deceased asylum seekers, from which they could be identified, as a matter of course, as might previously have been the case.”
The decision notice also showed that it is not standard Home Office “practice to locate or attempt to contact a next of kin” of those who die in its care, “unless there is a surviving dependent on the Asylum Support package.”
While recognising that the withheld information may allow relatives or others previously close to the deceased to speculate that the information relates to them, the ICO said it “cannot see how the deceased individuals would be identified with absolute certainty.”
In regard to the Home Office’s information causing “a detrimental effect on the physical or mental health of any individual,” the ICO said it cannot see how this risk “would be a greater impact than causing upset and distress.”
The Commissioner said it was aware that the Home Office has previously disclosed deaths relating to asylum seekers in Home Office accommodation to The Civil Fleet.
“The Commissioner would expect that, were there any realistic risk of endangerment to any individual’s physical or mental health, the Home Office would have been able to evidence this after that information had been disclosed,” the ICO said.
“No actual evidence of any endangerment resulting from previous disclosure has been presented to the Commissioner.
“The Commissioner is therefore not persuaded that the Home Office’s arguments are sufficient to demonstrate a causal relationship between the endangerment to the physical or mental health of any individual and the disclosure of the requested information.
“He therefore finds that section 38(1)(a) of the FOIA is not engaged and the withheld information should be disclosed.”
The Home Office has until April 4 (“35 calendar days of the date of this decision notice”) to disclose all the requested information.
“Failure to comply may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court pursuant to section 54 of the Act and may be dealt with as a contempt of court,” the ICO said.
The Home Office has the right to appeal against the ICO’s decision notice to the First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights).
Features
Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya
A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.
In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.
According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.
LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.
The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.
One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.
“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”
LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.
The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.
In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.
The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.
Features
Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years
The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.
“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”
In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.
Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.
“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.
The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.
Sudan tops the list
The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.
The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.
Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.
“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”
A decade of the same pattern
Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.
“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”
What NRC is calling for
The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.
NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.
“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.
Features
Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.
Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.
“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”
IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.
This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.
The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.
The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.
Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.
People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.
IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.
Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.
Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region.
IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.
While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.
-
News1 week agoWar has devastated life for millions of refugees, displaced
-
Features1 week agoNetherlands, IOM reaffirm partnership including new multi-year funding commitment
-
Features1 week agoStabilization gains open pathway to development in Central African Republic: IOM Chief of Staff
-
News Extra1 week agoWest and Central Africa urges more climate funding as displacement rises
-
Features3 days agoEbola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks
-
News Extra1 week agoDiaspora remittances point to untapped potential in crisis response: New IOM report
-
News Extra5 days agoNigeria leads Liberia, Ghana, others as US set to deport migrants
-
Features4 days agoHaiti hosts over 1million displaced persons
