Connect with us

News

Are refugees also migrants?

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Migrants’ Rights Network in this series of Words Matter, wrote about thr use of the term “Migrants and refugees” versus “migrants, including refugees”.

The write up reads:

For a long time, we used the term “migrants and refugees” when referring to communities that we stand in solidarity with. Through reflection and learning, we have decided to shift our language to “migrants, including refugees”. Why exactly have we shifted our language?

Umbrella term
The term migrant is a general umbrella term, which encompasses refugees, asylum seekers, international students, migrant workers, undocumented migrants and many other migrant groups. Refugees are migrants: they are a subgroup of migrants with protection needs and rights. Placing an “and” in between “migrants” and “refugees” incorrectly implies that refugees are not a subgroup of migrants, and also begins to reinforce divisive narratives.

Divisive narratives: a deliberate separation
We have also reflected on the fact that “migrants” and “refugees” are constructed by politicians and the media as separate unrelated groups. This is deliberate. Generally, refugees are constructed as “deserving” and “genuine”, with a “legitimate” claim to protection, because they are fleeing war and persecution. This is in contrast with those who are constructed to be “simply migrants”, who are generally constructed to be “undeserving”, “ungenuine”, and with an “illegitimate” claim to protection. Even within the categorisation of refugees, we are witnessing a binary between “genuine” and “ungenuine”. With White refugees, such as Ukrainians, being labelled as “genuine”, whilst other refugees, such as Sudanese, Afghan and Iraqi refugees, being labelled as “ungenuine”.

This separation is a key element of divide and rule. It means we and others start to think about and label groups of people on the move based on where they come from and whether we think they need protection. The Government, the UNHCR, and general society pits marginalised groups against each other through narratives of deservingness. We reject this framing, and so our language must also develop to reflect our values.

White refugees in particular are also framed as having no other choice but to come here. Their movement is framed as forced and involuntary, which it is. However, they are deliberately separated from racialised refugees, and other migrants, whose movement is deemed to be voluntary, and because of this, they are denied the respect and empathy that is sometimes only afforded to White refugees. Whilst there are of course levels to suffering, our immigration system is unable to recognise the validity in the multitude of reasons that people move.

Fostering solidarity
A shift from “migrants and refugees” to “migrants, including refugees” also helps us to focus on the interconnectedness of all our experiences, and serves as an exercise in building solidarity and common ground between interdependent struggles. No-one is arguing that the experience of an asylum seeker, who has lived through the asylum system or who has been held in immigration detention, is quite the same as an international student, or a migrant who moves to access better work opportunities. But we do know they can and do also suffer under our immigration systems too, so, what we can do is recognise the commonalities between our experiences and struggles.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ICC confirmation of 17 charges against El-Hishri draws praise from rights groups

Published

on

Photo: Marnette
Kindly share this article

Human rights organisations and migrant rights advocates have welcomed the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to confirm all 17 charges against Osama El-Hishri, describing it as a landmark step towards justice for victims of abuses committed at Libya’s notorious Mitiga Prison.

The ICC’s confirmation of the charges clears the way for El-Hishri to stand trial over allegations linked to murder, torture, sexual violence and other crimes allegedly committed against detainees at the prison in Tripoli.

Reacting to the decision, migrant distress network Alarm Phone described the ruling as “historic” for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga Prison.

“The International Criminal Court confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri. This is a historic decision for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga prison in Libya,” the organisation said in a statement posted on X.

Alarm Phone also echoed calls by refugee advocacy group Refugees in Libya, saying the prosecution should mark the beginning of broader efforts to hold perpetrators of abuses in Libya accountable.

Similarly, Sea-Watch International hailed the ICC’s decision, noting that the confirmation means the case will now proceed to trial.

The organisation alleged that El-Hishri was a senior member of Libya’s Special Deterrence Force (SDF/RADA) militia and headed parts of Mitiga Prison, where migrants and refugees were subjected to severe human rights violations.

“The ICC confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri today. The case is going to trial,” Sea-Watch International said.

It added that people on the move detained at Mitiga Prison had been subjected to murder, torture and sexual violence, describing the prosecution as an important step in addressing longstanding impunity for abuses against migrants in Libya.

Activist Yousef Ismail also welcomed the court’s decision, saying it represented the kind of justice victims had long demanded.

“This is the real number; this is the truth we seek. We always speak of justice and respect for human rights. The International Criminal Court has fairly proven 17 charges against the so-called ‘Hashri,’ the rapist and the gatekeeper of Mitiga,” he wrote on X.

The ICC’s decision has been widely viewed by rights advocates as a significant milestone in efforts to secure accountability for crimes allegedly committed against migrants and refugees held in Libya’s detention system.

Campaigners, however, stressed that the prosecution of El-Hishri should not be the end of international efforts, urging authorities to investigate other individuals allegedly responsible for serious human rights violations in Libya’s detention facilities.

Continue Reading

News

Expert raises questions over UNHCR’s strategic direction after new leadership appointments

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A former Head of Policy Development and Evaluation at the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Jeff Crisp, has suggested that the organization’s newly announced leadership appointments could signal a shift in its priorities away from refugee protection and asylum toward humanitarian assistance and development.

Reacting to the appointments in a post on X, Crisp said the selection of the agency’s new senior officials “suggest that the agency might be going to focus on humanitarian assistance & development issues rather than refugee protection & asylum.”

He added that his concerns were reinforced by UNHCR’s support for the European Union’s Pact on Migration and Asylum.

“A suspicion strengthened by UNHCR’s endorsement of the EU Pact on Migration & Asylum,” Crisp wrote.

His comments came shortly after United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced the appointments of Tressa Rae Finerty as Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, Antón Leis García as Assistant High Commissioner for Operations, and Edem Wosornu as Assistant High Commissioner for Protection.

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih welcomed the appointments, saying the three officials bring extensive experience in humanitarian affairs, international cooperation and refugee protection. They are expected to assume their duties in the coming weeks.

Crisp’s remarks reflect concerns held by some refugee rights advocates and migration experts who have argued that UNHCR faces increasing pressure to balance its traditional mandate of protecting refugees and defending the right to asylum with expanding responsibilities in humanitarian response, development cooperation and migration management.

The appointments come at a time when the agency is grappling with record levels of forced displacement worldwide, shrinking humanitarian funding and increasingly restrictive asylum policies in many parts of the world.

Continue Reading

News

Conflict, displacement fuel Ebola outbreak in Eastern DR Congo, NRC warns

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) has warned that the ongoing Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is spreading in communities already devastated by years of armed conflict, displacement and inadequate access to basic services, urging the international community to step up funding and political support for the response.

In a statement, NRC’s Country Director in DR Congo, Eric Batonon, said the outbreak was unfolding in Ituri province, the current epicentre of the epidemic, where thousands of displaced people have spent years living in overcrowded shelters with poor sanitation and limited healthcare.

According to Batonon, prolonged violence by armed groups competing for control of land and mineral resources has forced millions from their homes, while the humanitarian crisis has received insufficient attention from donors and the international community.

He said these conditions had created an environment in which Ebola has been able to spread rapidly, contributing to the rising number of infections.

Batonon stressed that infection prevention and control measures must remain central to the response, adding that affected communities should play a leading role in shaping response strategies.

He said building trust and engaging directly with local populations would be critical to containing the outbreak, arguing that Ebola can only be effectively controlled when community priorities guide public health policies.

The NRC said it has intensified its Ebola response in eastern DRC through community awareness campaigns and preventive health measures. The organisation is establishing handwashing stations, distributing hygiene supplies and supporting efforts to reduce the risk of infection in affected communities.

It also said its teams are working to minimise disruptions to children’s education by helping schools operate safely during the outbreak.

In addition, NRC staff are assessing the impact of the epidemic on internally displaced persons in Ituri as well as neighbouring North and South Kivu provinces, where many people continue to live in overcrowded camps with inadequate sanitation facilities.

The findings, Batonon said, will help shape humanitarian interventions for some of the country’s most vulnerable populations.

The NRC noted that DR Congo has appeared on its annual list of the world’s most neglected displacement crises every year over the past decade, reflecting what it described as persistent international neglect of the humanitarian situation in the country’s east.

Batonon called on donors to provide flexible and sustained funding while increasing political engagement to ensure the Ebola response can outpace the spread of the disease and address the underlying humanitarian conditions that have worsened the outbreak.

Continue Reading

Trending