Connect with us

News

EU allocates €93.5 million to Tunisia in six years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The European Union allocated a whooping sum of €93.5 million to Tunisia between 2015 and 2021 to combat irregular migration, displacement, and instability.

This was contained in a July 19, 2023, Human Right Watch report titled Tunisia: No Safe Haven for Black African Migrants, Refugees.

The report said: “Between 2015 and 2021, the EU allocated €93.5 million to Tunisia from its “Emergency Trust Fund for Africa” (EUTF), which sought to combat irregular migration, displacement, and instability. This included €37.6 million for “border management” and efforts against “migrant smuggling and human trafficking.” A February 2022 EU document said the counter-smuggling/trafficking funding “provides for equipment and training for officers of the Internal Security Forces, as well as the Tunisian Customs.”

The same document said the EU would “designate” up to €85 million for migration-related projects in Tunisia in 2021-2022. It did not specify what had already been spent, though a February 2021 EU document stated, “A very significant EU-funded support programme, benefiting the Tunisian Coast Guard, is currently being implemented.” As much as €55 million of the €85 million could have been allocated to supporting migration control in Tunisia, based on the breakdown in the 2022 document: border management (€25m, including support to the coast guard); migration “governance” and protection (€6-10m); legal migration and labor mobility (€20-25m); combatting migrant smuggling/trafficking (€12-20m); and returns (€5m).

The 2022 document also details extensive bilateral support to Tunisia by Italy, Spain, France, Germany and other EU states. In addition to its “fund for migration cooperation (ca. €10 million),” Italy supplied equipment (vehicles, boats, and more) “for a total value of €138 million since 2011,” and “technical assistance related to border control (2017-2018) … for a total of €12 million,” which included support to the Tunisian police and national guard. Germany also provided boats and vehicles, while Spain supplied IT equipment.

The EU’s 2021-2027 “Multi-Country Migration Programme for the Southern Neighbourhood,” which encompasses Tunisia, incorporates some positive elements – support to development of asylum policies, legal migration pathways, civil society engagement – but still highlights support to “law enforcement action” and “border and coast guard authorities” for border control. Problematic project indicators conflate sea interceptions and rescues (“number of migrants intercepted/rescued through SAR operations at sea” and “on land”).

European politicians have repeatedly proposed various migration partnerships with Tunisia, including offshore processing centers, “safe third country” deals, and agreements that could allow returns of third-country nationals who transited Tunisia.

International law admits the possibility of safe third country designations, which enable receiving countries to transfer asylum seekers on the presumption that the country they travelled through, or some other country, can fairly examine their refugee claims and provide effective protection. UNHCR guidelines list conditions for such transfers, including respect for refugee and human rights law standards and “protection against threats to physical safety or freedom.” The EU Asylum Procedures Directive requires non-EU member states to meet specific criteria to be designated “safe,” including “no risk of serious harm.”

Given the documented abuses by security forces and xenophobic attacks against migrants, asylum seekers and refugees in Tunisia, in addition to Tunisia’s lack of a national asylum law, it appears that Tunisia does not meet EU law criteria for a safe third country. Black Africans in particular should not be forcibly returned or transferred to Tunisia.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ICC confirmation of 17 charges against El-Hishri draws praise from rights groups

Published

on

Photo: Marnette
Kindly share this article

Human rights organisations and migrant rights advocates have welcomed the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to confirm all 17 charges against Osama El-Hishri, describing it as a landmark step towards justice for victims of abuses committed at Libya’s notorious Mitiga Prison.

The ICC’s confirmation of the charges clears the way for El-Hishri to stand trial over allegations linked to murder, torture, sexual violence and other crimes allegedly committed against detainees at the prison in Tripoli.

Reacting to the decision, migrant distress network Alarm Phone described the ruling as “historic” for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga Prison.

“The International Criminal Court confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri. This is a historic decision for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga prison in Libya,” the organisation said in a statement posted on X.

Alarm Phone also echoed calls by refugee advocacy group Refugees in Libya, saying the prosecution should mark the beginning of broader efforts to hold perpetrators of abuses in Libya accountable.

Similarly, Sea-Watch International hailed the ICC’s decision, noting that the confirmation means the case will now proceed to trial.

The organisation alleged that El-Hishri was a senior member of Libya’s Special Deterrence Force (SDF/RADA) militia and headed parts of Mitiga Prison, where migrants and refugees were subjected to severe human rights violations.

“The ICC confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri today. The case is going to trial,” Sea-Watch International said.

It added that people on the move detained at Mitiga Prison had been subjected to murder, torture and sexual violence, describing the prosecution as an important step in addressing longstanding impunity for abuses against migrants in Libya.

Activist Yousef Ismail also welcomed the court’s decision, saying it represented the kind of justice victims had long demanded.

“This is the real number; this is the truth we seek. We always speak of justice and respect for human rights. The International Criminal Court has fairly proven 17 charges against the so-called ‘Hashri,’ the rapist and the gatekeeper of Mitiga,” he wrote on X.

The ICC’s decision has been widely viewed by rights advocates as a significant milestone in efforts to secure accountability for crimes allegedly committed against migrants and refugees held in Libya’s detention system.

Campaigners, however, stressed that the prosecution of El-Hishri should not be the end of international efforts, urging authorities to investigate other individuals allegedly responsible for serious human rights violations in Libya’s detention facilities.

Continue Reading

News

Expert raises questions over UNHCR’s strategic direction after new leadership appointments

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A former Head of Policy Development and Evaluation at the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Jeff Crisp, has suggested that the organization’s newly announced leadership appointments could signal a shift in its priorities away from refugee protection and asylum toward humanitarian assistance and development.

Reacting to the appointments in a post on X, Crisp said the selection of the agency’s new senior officials “suggest that the agency might be going to focus on humanitarian assistance & development issues rather than refugee protection & asylum.”

He added that his concerns were reinforced by UNHCR’s support for the European Union’s Pact on Migration and Asylum.

“A suspicion strengthened by UNHCR’s endorsement of the EU Pact on Migration & Asylum,” Crisp wrote.

His comments came shortly after United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced the appointments of Tressa Rae Finerty as Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, Antón Leis García as Assistant High Commissioner for Operations, and Edem Wosornu as Assistant High Commissioner for Protection.

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih welcomed the appointments, saying the three officials bring extensive experience in humanitarian affairs, international cooperation and refugee protection. They are expected to assume their duties in the coming weeks.

Crisp’s remarks reflect concerns held by some refugee rights advocates and migration experts who have argued that UNHCR faces increasing pressure to balance its traditional mandate of protecting refugees and defending the right to asylum with expanding responsibilities in humanitarian response, development cooperation and migration management.

The appointments come at a time when the agency is grappling with record levels of forced displacement worldwide, shrinking humanitarian funding and increasingly restrictive asylum policies in many parts of the world.

Continue Reading

News

Conflict, displacement fuel Ebola outbreak in Eastern DR Congo, NRC warns

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) has warned that the ongoing Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is spreading in communities already devastated by years of armed conflict, displacement and inadequate access to basic services, urging the international community to step up funding and political support for the response.

In a statement, NRC’s Country Director in DR Congo, Eric Batonon, said the outbreak was unfolding in Ituri province, the current epicentre of the epidemic, where thousands of displaced people have spent years living in overcrowded shelters with poor sanitation and limited healthcare.

According to Batonon, prolonged violence by armed groups competing for control of land and mineral resources has forced millions from their homes, while the humanitarian crisis has received insufficient attention from donors and the international community.

He said these conditions had created an environment in which Ebola has been able to spread rapidly, contributing to the rising number of infections.

Batonon stressed that infection prevention and control measures must remain central to the response, adding that affected communities should play a leading role in shaping response strategies.

He said building trust and engaging directly with local populations would be critical to containing the outbreak, arguing that Ebola can only be effectively controlled when community priorities guide public health policies.

The NRC said it has intensified its Ebola response in eastern DRC through community awareness campaigns and preventive health measures. The organisation is establishing handwashing stations, distributing hygiene supplies and supporting efforts to reduce the risk of infection in affected communities.

It also said its teams are working to minimise disruptions to children’s education by helping schools operate safely during the outbreak.

In addition, NRC staff are assessing the impact of the epidemic on internally displaced persons in Ituri as well as neighbouring North and South Kivu provinces, where many people continue to live in overcrowded camps with inadequate sanitation facilities.

The findings, Batonon said, will help shape humanitarian interventions for some of the country’s most vulnerable populations.

The NRC noted that DR Congo has appeared on its annual list of the world’s most neglected displacement crises every year over the past decade, reflecting what it described as persistent international neglect of the humanitarian situation in the country’s east.

Batonon called on donors to provide flexible and sustained funding while increasing political engagement to ensure the Ebola response can outpace the spread of the disease and address the underlying humanitarian conditions that have worsened the outbreak.

Continue Reading

Trending