News
UK offering £3000 to people refused asylum to relocate them to Rwanda
The Home Office is currently contacting some people who have been refused asylum in the UK to offer them £3000 to relocate to Rwanda, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) has said.
This, the JCWI said is separate from the Rwanda forced removals scheme commonly known as the ‘Rwanda plan,’ which targets people who are currently seeking asylum.
Many of the details of the scheme are still unclear, and we will update this document as the situation changes. Here is what we know so far:
What is the ‘voluntary departures’ scheme?
On 11 March 2024, the Home Office published its ‘voluntary and assisted departures’ guidance. The Government has for a long time had a scheme for people to “voluntarily” leave the UK to their home country if their asylum claim has been refused or if they would otherwise be deported. However, this can now include ‘voluntary departures’ to a third country, including Rwanda. This is a significant shift in policy. A similar scheme previously existed under the Dublin agreement when the UK was part of the EU. As far as we know, the Government currently only has a deal like this with Rwanda. However, the Government has repeatedly refused to publish its new agreement with Rwanda.
What is the £3,000 offer?
Under this policy, the Government can offer people money, supposedly to help them get settled in the new country. The Government has been calling people on the phone to offer them £3,000 to move to Rwanda under this deal. The offer is voluntary, which means people can say no. However, we are concerned that people who are not allowed to work or access the public safety net may feel less able to decline.
How is this different from the forced removals to Rwanda?
This is entirely separate from what has been called the Rwanda plan under the Rwanda Treaty / Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP). Under that plan, people who claim asylum in the UK but whose claims are deemed ‘inadmissible’ could be forcibly removed to Rwanda. See our explainer about the forced removals to Rwanda here. The voluntary scheme is separate, and the Home Office said it is currently only targeting people who have claimed asylum in the UK, had their claim heard here, but been refused. However, the Government has stated that people sent to Rwanda under the voluntary scheme will get the same benefits as those forcibly removed under the MEDP.
Who is targeted by the ‘voluntary departures’ scheme?
The Home Office has said they are targeting people whose asylum claims have been refused. However, we don’t know exactly what that means and if there are other criteria. It is not clear, for example, whether this includes people who have been refused asylum but have not yet appealed, or people whose claim is treated as withdrawn by the Home Office. The majority of asylum refusals are overturned on appeal, and there are cases where people’s asylum claims are wrongly treated as withdrawn e.g. if the Home Office sends a letter to the wrong address. We also don’t know how many people are being offered the scheme, because the Home Office refuses to publish that information.
What’s the problem?
The Government has not published its agreement with Rwanda, or details of any safeguards or independent monitoring of this scheme.
The Government has not published the criteria used to select people for ‘voluntary departure’ to Rwanda, nor the number of people offered this option.
The Government claims through the ‘Safety of Rwanda’ Act that Rwanda is a “safe third country”, despite the fact that our Supreme Court ruled in November 2023 that Rwanda is not safe, particularly for certain groups like members of the LGBTQI+ community.
We are concerned that the Home Office appears to be directly approaching people by phone, without outlining their options or rights in writing, or ensuring they have had appropriate language support or legal advice.
The Home Office has made no assurances that the people being made this offer are adequately informed of the safety risks in Rwanda.
This scheme raises serious ethical questions and we are extremely concerned that this will lead people to make decisions without the ability to provide full and informed consent.
While the Government has said that people sent to Rwanda are eligible for permanent settlement in Rwanda, it is not clear what immigration status people will have when they arrive.
What can I do?
If you are offered voluntary departure to Rwanda, YOU CAN SAY NO. DO NOT RESPOND OR SIGN ANYTHING UNTIL YOU HAVE LEGAL ADVICE.
News
ICC confirmation of 17 charges against El-Hishri draws praise from rights groups
Human rights organisations and migrant rights advocates have welcomed the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) decision to confirm all 17 charges against Osama El-Hishri, describing it as a landmark step towards justice for victims of abuses committed at Libya’s notorious Mitiga Prison.
The ICC’s confirmation of the charges clears the way for El-Hishri to stand trial over allegations linked to murder, torture, sexual violence and other crimes allegedly committed against detainees at the prison in Tripoli.
Reacting to the decision, migrant distress network Alarm Phone described the ruling as “historic” for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga Prison.
“The International Criminal Court confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri. This is a historic decision for survivors of crimes committed at Mitiga prison in Libya,” the organisation said in a statement posted on X.
Alarm Phone also echoed calls by refugee advocacy group Refugees in Libya, saying the prosecution should mark the beginning of broader efforts to hold perpetrators of abuses in Libya accountable.
Similarly, Sea-Watch International hailed the ICC’s decision, noting that the confirmation means the case will now proceed to trial.
The organisation alleged that El-Hishri was a senior member of Libya’s Special Deterrence Force (SDF/RADA) militia and headed parts of Mitiga Prison, where migrants and refugees were subjected to severe human rights violations.
“The ICC confirmed all 17 charges against El-Hishri today. The case is going to trial,” Sea-Watch International said.
It added that people on the move detained at Mitiga Prison had been subjected to murder, torture and sexual violence, describing the prosecution as an important step in addressing longstanding impunity for abuses against migrants in Libya.
Activist Yousef Ismail also welcomed the court’s decision, saying it represented the kind of justice victims had long demanded.
“This is the real number; this is the truth we seek. We always speak of justice and respect for human rights. The International Criminal Court has fairly proven 17 charges against the so-called ‘Hashri,’ the rapist and the gatekeeper of Mitiga,” he wrote on X.
The ICC’s decision has been widely viewed by rights advocates as a significant milestone in efforts to secure accountability for crimes allegedly committed against migrants and refugees held in Libya’s detention system.
Campaigners, however, stressed that the prosecution of El-Hishri should not be the end of international efforts, urging authorities to investigate other individuals allegedly responsible for serious human rights violations in Libya’s detention facilities.
News
Expert raises questions over UNHCR’s strategic direction after new leadership appointments
A former Head of Policy Development and Evaluation at the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Jeff Crisp, has suggested that the organization’s newly announced leadership appointments could signal a shift in its priorities away from refugee protection and asylum toward humanitarian assistance and development.
Reacting to the appointments in a post on X, Crisp said the selection of the agency’s new senior officials “suggest that the agency might be going to focus on humanitarian assistance & development issues rather than refugee protection & asylum.”
He added that his concerns were reinforced by UNHCR’s support for the European Union’s Pact on Migration and Asylum.
“A suspicion strengthened by UNHCR’s endorsement of the EU Pact on Migration & Asylum,” Crisp wrote.
His comments came shortly after United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced the appointments of Tressa Rae Finerty as Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, Antón Leis García as Assistant High Commissioner for Operations, and Edem Wosornu as Assistant High Commissioner for Protection.
UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih welcomed the appointments, saying the three officials bring extensive experience in humanitarian affairs, international cooperation and refugee protection. They are expected to assume their duties in the coming weeks.
Crisp’s remarks reflect concerns held by some refugee rights advocates and migration experts who have argued that UNHCR faces increasing pressure to balance its traditional mandate of protecting refugees and defending the right to asylum with expanding responsibilities in humanitarian response, development cooperation and migration management.
The appointments come at a time when the agency is grappling with record levels of forced displacement worldwide, shrinking humanitarian funding and increasingly restrictive asylum policies in many parts of the world.
News
Conflict, displacement fuel Ebola outbreak in Eastern DR Congo, NRC warns
The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) has warned that the ongoing Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is spreading in communities already devastated by years of armed conflict, displacement and inadequate access to basic services, urging the international community to step up funding and political support for the response.
In a statement, NRC’s Country Director in DR Congo, Eric Batonon, said the outbreak was unfolding in Ituri province, the current epicentre of the epidemic, where thousands of displaced people have spent years living in overcrowded shelters with poor sanitation and limited healthcare.
According to Batonon, prolonged violence by armed groups competing for control of land and mineral resources has forced millions from their homes, while the humanitarian crisis has received insufficient attention from donors and the international community.
He said these conditions had created an environment in which Ebola has been able to spread rapidly, contributing to the rising number of infections.
Batonon stressed that infection prevention and control measures must remain central to the response, adding that affected communities should play a leading role in shaping response strategies.
He said building trust and engaging directly with local populations would be critical to containing the outbreak, arguing that Ebola can only be effectively controlled when community priorities guide public health policies.
The NRC said it has intensified its Ebola response in eastern DRC through community awareness campaigns and preventive health measures. The organisation is establishing handwashing stations, distributing hygiene supplies and supporting efforts to reduce the risk of infection in affected communities.
It also said its teams are working to minimise disruptions to children’s education by helping schools operate safely during the outbreak.
In addition, NRC staff are assessing the impact of the epidemic on internally displaced persons in Ituri as well as neighbouring North and South Kivu provinces, where many people continue to live in overcrowded camps with inadequate sanitation facilities.
The findings, Batonon said, will help shape humanitarian interventions for some of the country’s most vulnerable populations.
The NRC noted that DR Congo has appeared on its annual list of the world’s most neglected displacement crises every year over the past decade, reflecting what it described as persistent international neglect of the humanitarian situation in the country’s east.
Batonon called on donors to provide flexible and sustained funding while increasing political engagement to ensure the Ebola response can outpace the spread of the disease and address the underlying humanitarian conditions that have worsened the outbreak.
-
News2 weeks agoFavour Henshaw appointed administrator of Platform for Cooperation on Mixed Migration
-
News3 weeks agoFormer UNHCR official sparks debate with ‘there is no such thing as a race’ comment
-
News2 weeks agoLampedusa: built to accommodate 400 people, now holds thousands of migrants
-
News Extra2 weeks agoPope urges European leaders to make greater investment in developing migrants’ countries of origin
-
News6 days agoIYAMIDR commends Okpebholo for ₦1m support to South Africa returnees
-
Features3 weeks ago1,500 young Chadians to benefit from EU, IOM funds
-
News2 weeks agoWorld silent as drone strikes, extreme hunger ravage El Obeid families
-
Features3 weeks agoEU, IOM, launch regional programme to help countries respond to climate displacement
