Connect with us

Features

EU: Stop criminalising migration in the facilitator’s package law

Published

on

Kindly share this article

Geretteter mit rotem T-Shirt schaut von Bord der Humanity 1 auf das Mittelmeer.
Maria Giulia Trombini / SOS Humanity

When the European Commission published the Facilitator’s Package in 2023, its stated goal was to protect migrants from being exploited by “professional smugglers” and undertaking dangerous journeys to Europe.

In reality, the Package’s proposed Facilitation Directive criminalises migrants and human rights defenders instead of targeting organised crime networks, and the Europol Regulation unlawfully expands the agency’s powers and resources by capitalising on right-wing politicisation of migration. 

It ignores the EU’s role in restricting regular routes for migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, and contributing to environmental, political and economic instability in their home countries – forcing them to seek life-threatening alternatives.A red life jacket in the waves of the central MediterraneanWanda Proft / SOS Humanity

The EU must:

1. AMEND THE FACILITATION DIRECTIVE TO PROTECT MIGRANTS BY INCLUDING

a. A clear legal definition of smuggling as a for-profit activity aligned with existing international standards 

b. An explicit and legally binding humanitarian exemption that protects migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, their families, and human rights defenders from being charged with smuggling

2. REJECT THE EUROPOL REGULATION IN ITS ENTIRETY

a. Unlawful – the proposal expands the agency’s powers beyond its ‘cooperation’ mandate and above Member State competencies

b. Unsafe – the proposed increase in Europol’s mass data collection mandate risks widespread violations of privacy and fundamental rights, as denounced by the European Data Protection Supervisor. It also pushes data sharing with known human rights violators Frontex and third countries

c. Unsubstantiated – the proposal was presented without a proper impact assessment, going against the EU’s own Better Regulation Guidelines. The European Parliament’s substitute impact assessment calls into question the effectiveness and lawfulness of the proposal.

The Package is simply a continuation of the erosion of the right to seek asylum and the criminalisation of human movement laid down by the 2024 Migration and Asylum Pact. It feeds into right-wing fear mongering around migration and promotes a criminal law response to a social phenomenon. 

The EU continues to pour millions into violent criminal law approaches to migration that do not work. Public resources must instead be reallocated towards a system that meets the care and protection needs of all people, rather than targeting the most vulnerable.

SARAH CHANDER, DIRECTOR, EQUINOX INITIATIVE FOR RACIAL JUSTICE

“EU border policies create the criminal conditions under which people resort to networks in order to move. Lawmakers of the Facilitators Package face a political choice. They can direct the powers of the criminal law, policy, funding and personnel toward the purpose of punishing people in need, or focus on protecting people on the move and those in solidarity with them. The choice is simple.”

CHLOÉ BERTHÉLÉMY, EDRI

“The fight against so-called ‘migrant smuggling’ is an insidious pretext to unlawfully expand Europol’s powers. Turning Europol’s NSA-style surveillance capabilities against migrants and human right defenders will only lead to more pushbacks, violence and deaths at the EU borders. So not only it is hypocritical, but also extremely harmful. The only solution is the rejection of this Europol reform proposal.”

DOROTHEE KRÄMER, ADVOCACY OFFICER FOR SEA-WATCH

“The rage of European member states to punish people for seeking safety is out of control. Thousands are arrested and thrown in jail each year, often in trials that fail to uphold legal standards, simply for trying to exercise their right to asylum. But more repression won’t put an end to the dying at sea. The only way to avoid irregular entrance, is regular entrance and freedom of movement for all.”

Signatories

Organisations:

#DiasporaVote!

Ação Pela Identidade – API

Access Now

Action Aid

Africa Advocacy Foundation

All African Women’s Group

ALMA Community Therapies

Almena Cooperativa Feminista

Àltera APS

Alternatif Bilisim

APDHA-Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de Andalucía

Apna Haq

Ariadni AMKE

Asociación  Por Ti Mujer

BePax

Biznegra

Boat Refugee Foundation

Border Violence Monitoring Network

CADO-Advocacy and Human Rights Center

Changemakers Lab

Comitato 3 Ottobre – Accoglienza ETS

Community Rights in Greece

CompassCollective

Coordinadora Obrim Fronteres

CPT – Aegean Migrant Solidarity

Creación Positiva

de:criminalize

Digitale Gesellschaft (Germany)

Equal Legal Aid

Equinox Initiative for Racial Justice

European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN)

European Civic Forum

European Network Against Racism (ENAR)

European Sex Workers’ Rights Alliance (ESWA)

Fédération des tunisiens citoyens des deux rives (FTCR)

Filipino Women’s Council

Flüchtlingshilfe Iran e.V

forRefugees

Fuga.coop

German NGO Network against Trafficking in Human Beings – KOK

Global Asylum Seeker Human Rights Defenders Committee (GASHDC)

Global Women Against Deportations

Greek Council for Refugees (GCR)

Greek Forum of Migrants

Hermes Center

Hoatzin

Hoffnung leben e.V.

Homo Digitalis

Human Rights Legal Project

Humanity Diaspo ONG

ILEX- Acción Juridica

Intereuropean Human Aid Association

International Coalition for People of African Descent ICPAD

International Service for Human Rights

International Women* Space

INTERSOS HELLAS

Islamic Human Rights Commission

Kif Kif vzw

Lafede.cat – Organitzacions per la Justícia Global

Legal Centre Lesvos

Love Without Borders

Migrant Tales

Migration Consortium

Mobile Info Team

Movement of Asylum Seekers in Ireland (MASI)

New Bulgarian University

New Women Connectors

No Name Kitchen

Northern Ireland Council for Racial Equality

Northern Lights Aid

Northern Police Monitoring Project

Ona bros

Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM)

Podlaskie Ochotnicze Pogotowie Humanitarne

Politiscope

Privacy International

QueeriséEs

Racism and Technology Center

Refugee Legal Support (RLS)

Refugees in Libya

Revibra

Romnja Feminist Library

Samos Volunteers

Saplinq, o.z.

SARAH gUG

Sea-Eye e.V.

Sea-Watch e.V.

Seebrücke

SOLIDAR

Solidary Wheels

SOS Humanity e.V.

Spazio di Mutuo Soccorso

SPECTRUM

Statewatch

SUPERRR Lab

The Channel Monitoring Project

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)

The Institute for Technology in the Public Interest (TITiPI)

Transnational Institute

Tunisian Forum for Social and Economic Rights FTDES

Über den Tellerrand e.V.

UHURU VALENCIA

UNESCO Inclusive Policy Lab- People of African Descent & SDGs E-Team

United African Women Organization

Up

Utopia 56

Vasilika Moon – La Luna di Vasilika NPO

WeMove Europe

WIDE+ (Women In Development Europe+)

Women of Colour in the Global Women’s Strike

DIOTIMA

Individuals:

Afrika Inkindi

Anna Gruber

Anouar El Hajjami-Jarri

Asher Serrana

Asli Telli

Astrid Schreiber

Astrid Schreiber

Blanca Callén Moreu

Carlos José Marques Salgado

Charito Basa

Daniela Schneider

Diana Podar

Doreen Olivia Williams

Dorrie Wilson

Dr Adi Kuntsman

Elisa Damaso

Emma Martín Díaz

Ewa Trojanowska

Felix Diaz Martinez

Georgia Brooks

Glenn Leihner-Guarin

Ivana Stojanova

Iyo Bisseck

Jara Henar

Jessica Machacova

Karolina Mazurek

Katarina Baltar

Katarzyna Anna Augustynek

Kayra vee Martinez

Laïla B

Lamar Bailey Karamañites

Laurenz Koppenhagen

Leonie Mensel

Luka Mester

Lutz Bucklitsch

Mafe Moscoso

Maisy Vincent

Marek Męczyński

Marga Burgui Artajo

Mariam Camilla Rechchad

Mhe Hakobyan

Misamu Nzabi

Mouhieddine Cherbib

Olga Lubicz

Ona Bros

Osman Vatansever

Paulino Gonzalez

Piotr Fijałkowski – Obywatele RP

Prof. Jan Tobias Muehlberg

Robert Krzysztoń

Romdhane Ben Amor

Selamauyt Tesfaye

Stella Nyanzi

Susana Mariano Anastácio

Tamara Rubin

Terri Beswick

Vinya Mehta

Additional resources

Analysis and recommendations from:

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Rights group reports rise in abuses, hate speech against migrants in Libya

Published

on

Kindly share this article

A Libyan human rights organization has raised alarm over what it describes as a sharp increase in violations against migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign workers across Libya since the beginning of June 2026.

In a statement released this week, Libya Crimes Watch (LCW) said it has documented widespread arrests, raids on migrant residences, forced evictions, and physical and verbal assaults in both eastern and western parts of the country. The group also reported a surge in hate speech and incitement to violence targeting migrant communities.

According to LCW, its field teams have monitored large-scale arrest campaigns in several cities, including Tripoli, Benghazi, Ajdabiya, and Al-Bayda. Those detained reportedly include women and children. The organization said it has also documented incidents in which migrants were forcibly removed from their homes and subjected to abuse, including individuals with existing health conditions.

LCW alleged that the operations are being carried out by security agencies and armed groups affiliated with authorities in both eastern and western Libya. The group named the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), the Directorate for Combatting Illegal Migration (DCIM), and the General Directorate of Security Operations (GDSO), among others, as entities involved in the campaigns.

The organization further expressed concern over what it described as the involvement of civilians in some raids and assaults. It also cited widespread anti-migrant rhetoric on social media and in local media outlets, including platforms it said are aligned with authorities and official institutions. According to LCW, such messaging has contributed to increased hostility toward migrants and encouraged participation in actions targeting them.

One Sudanese migrant, identified by the pseudonym “Inas” for security reasons, recounted an alleged attack on her family. She told LCW that armed men entered their home, assaulted family members, used racist language, and forced them from the property before stealing their belongings.

“We are now on the street with nowhere to go,” she said, according to the statement. “We have a sick family member who needs care, and we have found no organization to help or protect us.”

LCW said Libyan authorities in both the east and west bear legal responsibility for protecting migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers and ensuring respect for their rights under international human rights law. The organization called for an immediate end to abuses, protection against violence and forced evictions, and a halt to deportations or forced returns that could expose individuals to persecution or other harm.

The group also urged the Office of the Libyan Attorney General to stop detaining people solely on the basis of their migration or asylum status and to investigate all reported violations. LCW called for those responsible for abuses, including individuals who ordered, participated in, or facilitated them, to be held accountable through fair and independent legal proceedings.

In addition, the organization appealed to international bodies, including the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), to take urgent measures to protect migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers at risk in Libya.

The allegations have not been independently verified, and Libyan authorities had not publicly responded to the claims at the time of the statement’s release.

Continue Reading

Features

Neglect deepens as DRC appears on NRC’s list of top neglected displacement for 10 years

Published

on

Kindly share this article

The Democratic Republic of Congo has appeared on the Norwegian Refugee Council’s (NRC) annual list of top neglected displacement crises, for the tenth year running, and the neglect is deepening.

“This is a testament to the world’s failure to respond to crises that are not regarded as strategically important for rich countries,” said NRC’s Secretary General Jan Egeland. “Millions of people are being abandoned because we have chosen not to act, not because we cannot. The uncomfortable truth is that this neglect is a choice, and something we can choose to end.”

In 2025, just 27.4 per cent of the funding required to respond to the crisis in DR Congo was provided, the lowest rate in 10 years, leaving over 21 million people in need with no or drastically reduced assistance. A decade ago, the international community was providing 55 US dollars per person in need in DR Congo. Today that figure has collapsed to under 33 US dollars.

Countries such as Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Mali and Nigeria have all featured on the list six or more times, pointing to a systemic pattern of deliberate neglect rather than isolated failure.

“Donor governments have been presented with evidence of neglect, year after year. Yet those in power still choose to prioritise military and strategic investments and underfund, deprioritise and sideline the victims of these crises. It is a failure of our humanity,” said Egeland.

The report is the tenth edition of NRC’s Neglected Displacement Crises Report, tracking how responses continue to fall short of the scale of suffering.

Sudan tops the list

The 10 most neglected crises for 2025 are Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Honduras, Ecuador, Cameroon, Nigeria and Mozambique, spanning three continents and tens of millions of people the world continues to ignore.

The Neglected Displacement Crises Report assesses each crisis across four indicators: media coverage, funding, political attention, and scale of displacement. A lower score indicates a larger gap between the scale of human suffering and the adequacy of international response.

Sudan tops this year’s list. More than 9 million people are internally displaced, and up to 4 million have fled to neighbouring countries. Nearly 19.5 million people inside Sudan are facing hunger, yet the international response remains wholly inadequate to that scale of suffering.

“It is incomprehensible that a displacement crisis of similar proportions to the crises in Syria and Ukraine at their peak can continue to worsen almost unnoticed,” Egeland said. “Just as needs in Sudan skyrocketed last year and famine kept spreading, the funding was cut. Many displaced people receive no international support and are left to beg for assistance from other displaced people who no longer have anything more to share.”

A decade of the same pattern

Since NRC began publishing this report 10 years ago, 27 crises across four continents have appeared on the list, and the pattern is unambiguous. The African continent features the most consistently. From the Sahel region to the Horn of Africa, from the Great Lakes to West Africa, many of these are cases of prolonged or repeated displacement. Across the board, neglect coincides with access restrictions for humanitarians. With rare exceptions, the crises that were ignored a decade ago are still being ignored today. In DR Congo, the Ebola outbreak now spreading across eastern parts of the country — declared a public health emergency of international concern by WHO in May 2026 — is unfolding in communities already devastated by years of displacement and humanitarian neglect.

“Behind every statistic in eastern DR Congo are families who have endured years of violence, repeated displacement, and deep uncertainty about their future,” said Eric Batonon, NRC’s country director in the Democratic Republic of Congo. “While attention shifts from one global emergency to another, millions of Congolese continue to live without adequate protection, assistance, or hope. The fact that DR Congo remains among the world’s most neglected crises for the tenth consecutive year should serve as a wake-up call to the international community.”

What NRC is calling for

The gap between needs and available humanitarian funding is increasing as a result of brutal humanitarian funding cuts. This is affecting the neglected crises particularly hard, as these crises are already characterised by less available funding per person in need.

NRC urges donor governments to fund crises based on humanitarian need and scale of displacement, not geopolitical interest. It calls on political leaders and diplomats to engage seriously with the root causes of protracted displacement, many of which persist precisely because they are seen as having little geopolitical importance. It also calls on media organisations to report on these crises with the consistency and depth they demand as ongoing emergencies.

“The crises ignored today will demand a larger, costlier and more complex response tomorrow,” said Egeland. “The world does not lack for skills nor resources. Be it arranging football World Cups, or pioneering space exploration: our ability to organise and overcome challenges is almost without limit. We can and must finally take the decision to end the neglect that has caused such deep suffering for millions of people”.

Continue Reading

Features

Ebola: Border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks

Published

on

Health screening at Arua Airport in Uganda supported by IOM to support Ebola health surveillance and enhance early detection in the country. Photo Credit IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has urged governments and partners to strengthen urgently cross-border coordination to contain the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (Ebola) outbreak, warning that border closures alone risk driving movement underground and increasing transmission risks.

Latest World Health Organization (WHO) figures show 116 suspected cases, 321 confirmed cases, 48 deaths, and six recovered cases in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). In Uganda, there have been nine confirmed cases, and one death to date.

“Viruses do not stop at borders, and neither should our response,” said Ugochi Daniels, IOM Deputy Director General for Operations. “When borders close, people often continue moving through informal routes where health screening and surveillance are limited. The most effective response is coordinated action that keeps mobility visible, safe and monitored.”

IOM warns that reactive border closures can reduce visibility of population movements, undermining health screening, surveillance, contact tracing and early detection efforts. Evidence from previous health emergencies shows that movement restrictions do not stop mobility but often redirect it towards informal and less-monitored routes.

This is the 17th Ebola outbreak recorded in the DRC and the third largest on record, highlighting both the recurring nature of the disease and the importance of sustained preparedness.

The outbreak is unfolding in one of the world’s most complex humanitarian contexts. Eastern DRC is already affected by conflict and large-scale displacement. As of March 2026, 3.6 million people have been internally displaced in the country, including nearly 922,000 displaced in Ituri Province alone, where the outbreak is centred.

The confirmation of cross-border transmission between DRC and Uganda further highlights the urgency of coordinated regional action, particularly in areas where daily cross-border movement is essential for trade, livelihoods and access to basic services.

Data from IOM’s Flow Monitoring Registry at key formal and informal crossing points—including Cyanika, Busunga, Bunagana, Mpondwe, Goli, Vurra, Busanza and Ntoroko—shows that cross-border mobility continues despite restrictions, including through informal routes, reinforcing the need for data-driven and coordinated response measures.

People living in displacement sites, border communities and conflict-affected areas face heightened vulnerability due to limited access to healthcare, clean water and other essential services, increasing the risk of undetected transmission.

IOM is supporting governments and partners in DRC, Uganda and neighbouring countries by strengthening border health operations, population mobility mapping, disease surveillance, risk communication and community engagement in high-mobility areas.

Understanding where, why and how people move remains critical to preventing further spread. Public health measures must be informed by mobility patterns and coordinated across borders to ensure effective containment while avoiding unintended consequences that push movement out of sight.

Significant funding gaps continue to constrain the scale and speed of response efforts, including preparedness activities across the region. 

IOM welcomes the swift financial contribution from the United States, which is helping to strengthen frontline response efforts and save lives. Close coordination with the African Union, Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, WHO and United Nations partners remains essential to containing the outbreak.

While Ebola is a preventable and containable disease, additional resources are urgently needed to sustain surveillance systems, maintain border health operations, strengthen community-based prevention efforts and expand support in displacement settings.

Continue Reading

Trending