Connect with us

Uncategorized

Nigerian govt mum after Egyptian policemen framed citizen for sexual assault in Cairo

Published

2 years ago

on

Kindly share this article

Many weeks after Egyptian policemen harassed and framed Nigerian cleric Rev Dr Israel Kristilere for sexual assault at Cairo International Airport, neither the government nor its concerned agencies has deemed it necessary to speak on the dehumanising development.

The silence of the Nigerian authorities according to observers of the incident goes a long way to show the value the government places on its citizens. For the observers, the choice of the Nigerian government to ignore the Egyptian officials’ condemnable action could make other countries mete out worse treatment to the citizens.

As of the time of filing this report, Nigeria’s Foreign Affairs Ministry is yet to comment on the development.

The Nigeria In Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM) which was quick to jump on the case of the citizens trafficked to Ghana has also not seen any good reason to comment on the incident probably because it hasn’t generated so much public attention it could latch on to to win cheap applause from the public.

The predicament of the Nigerian cleric is narrated below:

Rev Dr Israel Kristilere, the Senior Pastor of SheperdHill Baptist Church Obanikoro Lagos and CEO of Oasis of Faith Intercontinental Limited, a private Christian pilgrimage company in a viral video in a viral video last week told about how Egyptian policemen framed him up for sexual assault at Cairo International Airport while waiting to board a plane to Amman.

Reliving his experience in the viral video, Reverend Kristilere said:

“I had a very traumatic experience at Cairo International Airport on April 30, 2024. I left Lagos for Amman through Egypt Airlines with a group of 28 pilgrims and we had a stopover for four hours in Cairo before we boarded the second leg from Cairo to Amman,” he said as he began reliving hi ordeal in the video.

“I took all our pilgrims o our connecting Gate H2 around 9pm. And having sent them there, myself and another woman on the trip who are flying business class left for the business class lounge. We were in that lounge until one hour before our next flight when I told her to let us go back to the gate since I saw the notification that the gate of our connecting flight was open.

On getting there, Rev Kristilere said, “I saw the pilgrims seated and not going through the gate’s security checks. I asked them why and they replied that they tried to but were asked to go back and sit down and allow others to go through the check first. I then went to the counter and asked a young man I saw there if they were not attending to Amman passengers yet and he confirmed that they were already doing that.

“So, I told all the pilgrims to rise up and let us go through the gate formalities to board our next flight. As we lined up to go through the formalities, I saw some policemen and some airport staff discussing. I wondered what they were talking about and initially I thought it was about our documentation or visa that they wanted to confirm.”

Police whisk cleric away

In the course of trying to get his people to be attended to, a team of police officers asked the reverend to step aside and allow others to go through the security check. “At that time, I told the other woman to wait for me while others can go through their security checks. So the policemen asked me to follow them to their office. At this time I still assumed that it had to do with our documentation. I had to bring out all the documents relating to our trip.

“They then took me to the office of the head of the police of the airport. Three police officers entered with me while about 12 others waited outside looking at us through the door which was left open.”

To his chagrin, the chief police officer asked “if I knew what offence I had committed. I wondered what the offence was and replied ‘I had not committed any offence.’ Then they brought a man in as an interpreter who told me in English that a lady had just accused me of sexual assault and that the punishment was a jail term and that I should be ready to go to jail.”

Shocked by the allegation, Rev Kristilere retorted “who, where, when and how? Then they pointed at a lady who decided to hide her face behind another lady when I tried to look at her direction. I told the interpreter ‘I’d never seen the lady talkless of talking with her. The police chief then said ‘in our country we belief the world of any woman as true and that means with or without evidence you are guilty’. He then said there was a video evidence. When I heard that there was a video evidence, I was relieved and I requested for the video evidence.

“He later said there was no need for video evidence because it will make me miss my flight unless I agreed to their offered solution. I made it clear that if they had any video evidence , they would not find me there because I had been at the business class lounge for three hours and I had an alibi among my pilgrims who was there with me in the lounge till we left for the gate.

“Then they said there was a witness and immediately, a young man came forward and stated that he was a witness to the assault. I asked where and when but there was no answer. The police chief then said since there was a witness, I would only go if I accepted the solution he would offer.”

Continuing, he said: “I asked what was the solution, he then said I must apologise to the lady in a way that she must accept. I then asked, how do I apologise for what I had not done. He insisted if I did not apologise I shall be charged to court. I then tried to look in the direction of the lady who was still hiding her face behind another lady and said ‘lady, I have never met you. I have no idea of what you are talking about but possibly someone else has attacked you and you mistook me for the person, nevertheless, sorry to you if you are offended anyway. But let it be known that I have no idea of what you are saying. The police chief then turned to a man who was said to be her boss if my apology was accepted and he said it was okay.”

Police demand signature on weird document

The plot to nail the reverend didn’t stop at asking him for apology. Thereafter, the police chief said he should follow him to another office and leave his hand luggage behind. “I objected to that idea by saying ‘I cannot leave my bag behind because the rule of every airport is that passengers must always be with their luggage. I cannot leave my luggage behind’.

Around this time, I began to discern that they were up to something. They were trying to look for every means to se me up. When we got to the other office, I was asked to wait outside when the police chief and other officers entered. At this time, I told myself that if these people should succeed, there was no way to free myself.

“I was totally isolated from my pilgrims who were supposed to be boarding the next flight. I could not understand their conversation which they were making in Arabic. I then picked up my phone, pressed the record button and kept the phone back in my pocket at least that would be my only evidence in the future. After a while, they invited me to the office and was asked to come and sign a document they had prepared in Arabic. I refused to sign because I told them ‘I did not know what they had written. That would be stupid of me as an educated person. They said if I did not sign, I would go to jail. They said it did not matter, that what they just wrote was a settlement. I still said no.

“To the glory of God, I have spent over 25 years of my life studying up to PhD level. I cannot sign what I do not know. The police chief then got angry and shouted me down and said ‘you will miss your flight and I will detain you and will charge you to court. I then said to him, if God says I will go to jail for an offence I did not commit, so be it but I will not sign unless I know what was written. Then the so called interpreter offered to read the content to my hearing and I told him I could not trust his reading. I insisted that I could only sign if they rewrite it in English.”

When they began to mount pressure on him, Rev Kristilere said: “I took the biro and wrote below the Arabic write up ‘ I do not know. I planned to write ‘I do not know what is written above but I am compelled to sign this document, therefore, I am not aware of the contents above’. But when the saw me writing, ‘I do not in English’ one of the officers snatched the biro from me and shouted me down. The police chief then insisted that if I didn’t sign I will miss my flight which should have taken off and they will detain me and charge me to court the following morning. Then, an idea came to my mind. Since I had succeeded in writing ‘I do not below the Arabic, it speaks volumes. I picked the biro again and wrote my surname. While doing that, a desk manager of the check in counter came in and talked to them in Arabic.

“After a long Like magic, they handed over my passport to me and asked him to take me to the aircraft. I did not understand the magic words that effected my release until I got to the tarmac. At the foot of the aircraft, I saw all my 27 pilgrims standing at the entrance of the aircraft. They had refused to board the plane unless their leader was released against all pleas and threats even from the pilot who told them he will take off without them. They refused to enter the aircraft unless their leader was released. Now I know that was my saving grace.

The refusal of the 27 persons who had already checked in to enter the plane frustrated their plot. That was the reporter that the desk manager brought to this syndicate at their airport. They would have succeeded if I were travelling alone. I wonder what they would have achieved if there were no people that I was travelling with. The would have succeeded in making me miss my flight and extorted me, I am still traumatised by that event, wondering what would have happened. What else would have happened if there were no other passenger with me. No doubt, this could have happened gto many other persons who would have been charged to court for wrong accusations or ending up being extorted by this syndicate in that airport.

Aside from his experience, the clergyman said: “Many people have also relived their experiences in some of these airports but I wouldn’t want to talk about that since I haven’t personally.

“In Cairo, they have done that to many people. A woman went with three children and the following dsy when she woke up they told her she had two children. They asked where she got the third one because they only had record of two children. The woman said I submitted passports of myself and my three children yesterday. They said no that she smuggled the third child. You can imagine all manners of schemes that these do just to extort. The Nigerian government should do something to stem the tide. They should let the Egyptians know we are not inferior to them.”

Following the incident, the reverend said: “Many of us who are private tour operators have decided to steer clear of Egypt Air going to Israel. We just had a conference here in Tel Aviv where the Lord Bishop Stephen Adegbite and other stakeholders have decided that none of us should take Egypt Air to Jordan or Israel.”

More than a month after the incident, he said the Egyptian authorities have not deemed it necessary to apologise for the despicable conduct of its officials.

“They have not apologised. Egypt Air has also not reached out. There is no way Egypt Air will say that they are not aware of what happened. They all acted as if nothing happened.

—

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Refugees in Libya raises alarm over alleged sexual harassment of minor

Published

2 weeks ago

on

August 24, 2026

By

Kindly share this article

Refugees in Libya, an organisation advocating for refugees and migrants, has raised concerns over the alleged sexual harassment of a young Black refugee girl by a taxi driver in Tripoli.

In a post published on X on August 23, the organisation identified the alleged perpetrator as Ali, also known by the nickname “Al-Boura,” and said he is a resident of Qasr Bin Ghashir, Tripoli.

According to Refugees in Libya, the incident occurred on August 17 when Ali allegedly sexually harassed the girl, who the organisation said was a minor.

The organisation said the girl repeatedly asked the driver to stop and told him that she was underage and did not consent to his touching her. Despite her objections, the driver allegedly continued.

Refugees in Libya said the girl recorded and later shared a video of the incident on TikTok because she was afraid to report the alleged crime through official channels.

The organisation claimed that reporting such an incident could expose the refugee to the risk of arrest before she could formally file a complaint, highlighting what it described as the vulnerability of refugee women and girls in Libya.

The video subsequently circulated widely on social media, prompting mixed reactions from Libyans. According to Refugees in Libya, some users called for Ali’s arrest, while others reportedly demanded the arrest and imprisonment of the girl, questioning why she had recorded the incident and accusing her of being an agent of Western interests.

The organisation said it has since lost contact with the girl and does not know her current whereabouts, while the video continues to circulate online.

Refugees in Libya also expressed concern that, despite information allegedly being made public about Ali’s whereabouts, there was still no evidence that law enforcement authorities had arrested him.

The organisation’s account could not independently establish whether an arrest had been made or verify the full circumstances surrounding the allegations.

The case has renewed concerns among refugee and migrant rights advocates about the protection of vulnerable migrants in Libya, particularly women and girls who may face barriers to reporting sexual violence and harassment.

Refugees in Libya called attention to the situation as part of its broader advocacy over the treatment and safety of refugees and migrants in the country.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

58 organisations, movements sign Cotonou Manifesto for freedom of movement

Published

4 weeks ago

on

August 12, 2026

By

Kindly share this article

Fifty-eight organisations, movements and collectives have signed the Cotonou Manifesto for Freedom of Movement, calling for an end to the externalisation of border controls, the closure of detention centres and greater protection for people on the move.

The manifesto was developed collectively through the Migration Village at the recently held World Social Forum in Cotonou, Benin. It was authored and led by survivors of migration routes and supported by organisations working on migration, human rights and freedom of movement.

Titled “Our Bodies Are Not Your Borders,” the manifesto brings together victims, survivors, families, activists and organisations that said they were committed to dismantling what they described as a racist migration regime.

The signatories said many survivors had experienced deadly desert crossings, prisons, detention centres, deportation flights, pushbacks, racist attacks, abductions at sea, enslavement and other forms of inhumane treatment. They argued that the suffering and deaths of migrants had increasingly been used to justify restrictive migration policies.

The groups accused the European Union of being at the forefront of policies that externalise border controls into Africa, saying European governments have funded and supported governments, coastguards, militias, detention systems and surveillance infrastructure to prevent migrants from reaching European territory.

They specifically cited cooperation with countries including Tunisia, Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Niger, Mauritania and Senegal, arguing that such arrangements had transformed parts of Africa into places of detention and danger for migrants. Libya, they said, had become a “laboratory” for the system.

The manifesto also criticised the role of Frontex, accusing the European Border and Coast Guard Agency of contributing to pushbacks and facilitating the interception of refugee boats. It further criticised what it described as the extension of Europe’s migration security apparatus into African countries.

The organisations also expressed concern about the role of international agencies, including the International Organisation for Migration and UNHCR, arguing that terms such as “risk analysis,” “border management” and “voluntary return” can conceal policies aimed at tracking, containing and deporting migrants before they reach their intended destinations.

African governments were also criticised. The signatories said African states could not continue portraying themselves solely as victims of European migration policies while accepting funding to police Europe’s borders and participating in the detention, deportation and abandonment of Africans on the continent.

They also accused the African Union of failing to adequately respond to the treatment of African migrants and said the continent’s commitment to free movement remained severely restricted.

The manifesto called for an end to the externalisation of border control, the closure of detention and so-called return centres, and effective access to asylum. It also urged states to honour international human rights and refugee protection commitments and called for survivors and families of migrants who died along migration routes to participate in institutions and negotiations affecting their lives.

The signatories further called for freedom of movement and the right of people to choose where they live and travel safely. They demanded the abolition of visa systems, arguing that these systems disproportionately burden people from the Global South.

According to the manifesto, freedom of movement would promote economic, social and cultural ties between countries and peoples, while strengthening women’s and gender minorities’ ability to seek safety and freedom. The signatories also linked free movement to Pan-African unity and decolonisation.

The groups said migrants and their allies would continue building transnational networks and solidarity structures to challenge restrictive border systems and support people on the move.

The manifesto concluded with a series of declarations, including: “Our forced migration is not your invasion,” “Human beings are not your bargaining chips,” “Our bodies are not Europe’s borders,” and “Our lives are not Africa’s currency.”

Among the 58 signatories are Refugees in Libya, WatchTheMed Alarm Phone, Migreurop, SOSAPROFEM, Southern Africa Migration Network, Voice of Migrants Association, Female Returned Migrant Network, Migrants Lives Matter, Advocates Female Migrants Initiative and several other African, European and international organisations.

The manifesto said the Migration Village at the World Social Forum in Cotonou represented another step toward strengthening cooperation among movements and survivors in the continuing campaign for freedom of movement.

The manifestor was authored and led by survivors. 

Supported by the following organizations, movements and collectives:

1. Advocates Female Migrants initiative (Nigeria)

2. Afrique-Europe Interact (transnational network)

3. Al Bawsala (Tunisia)

4. Alarme Phone Sahara

5. Alerte Migration Afrique (Burkina Faso)

6. Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies Program, San Francisco State University (USA)

7. Association des Mères des Disparus en Tunisie (Tunisia)

8. Association Éducation Togo (AET, Togo)

9. Association Malienne des Expulsés (AME, Mali)

10. Association Marocaine d’aide aux migrants en situation vulnérable (AMSV, Morocco)

11. Association Marocaine des droits humains (AMDH, Morocco)

12. Association Mauritanienne pour la Citoyenneté et le Développement (AMCD, Mauritania)

13. Association Nationale des Partenaires Migrants (ANPM, Senegal)

14. Association Togolaise des Expulsés (ATE, Togo)

15. Boza Fii (Senegal)

16. Caritas Dakar/PARI (Senegal)

17. Confédération générale autonome des travailleurs en Algérie (CGATA, Algeria)

18. Citoyennes Citoyens Debout Mauritanie (CCD, Mauritania)

19. Climáximo (Portugal)

20. Collective Against the Criminalization of Solidarity and Civic Engagement in Tunisia

21. Conseil des Migrants Subsahariens au Maroc (CMSM, Morocco)

22. CRID (France)

23. Direy Ben Gao/ RMSM (Mali)

24. Ebrima Migrant Situation Foundation (Gambia)

25. Female Returned Migrant network – FREMNET (Nigeria)

26. 50 Out of Many (Greece)

27. Groupe solidarité des groupements féminins au Togo

28. Jeunesses Nigérienne au Service du Développement Durable (JNSDD AIKIN KASA) (Niger)

29. KISA – Equality, Support, Antiracism (Cyprus)

30. Medico International

31. Mediterr

32. Migrants Lives Matter (Nigeria)

33. Migreurop (Euro-African network)

34. MV Louise Michel project

35. Network of Ex-Asylum Seekers – NEAS (Sierra Leone)

36. Network of People with Migration Experience (Nigeria)

37. Nomad 08 (Tunisia)

38. OGLMI – Terre de Liberté (Guinea)

39. ONG Opinion Éclairée (Ivory Coast)

40. ONG UNION FAIT LA FORCE (Benin)

41. Palestinian NGOs Network

42. Refugees in Libya (RiL)

43. Réseau Maghreb Sahel sur les Migrations

44. Réseau ROA-PRODMAC (African network)

45. Riposte internationale (Algeria)

46. Right2Protest Project Africa

47. Rootstv.tn (Tunisia)

48. Solidarités Asie France (SAF)

49. SOSAPROFEM (Senegal)

50. Southern Africa Migration Network (SAMIN)

51. Teaching Palestine: Pedagogical Praxis and the Indivisibility of Justice

52. trans-border.net Editorial Team

53. Un Monde Avenir (Cameroon)

54. Voice of Migrants Association – VOMA (Nigeria)

55. Voice of Talia Initiative Foundation (Nigeria)

56. WatchTheMed Alarm Phone

57. Welcome to Europe

58. We`ll Come United (Germany)

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Venezuela: IOM delivers support via in-kind cargo flight  funded by DHL’s Disaster Response Team

Published

2 months ago

on

July 13, 2026

By

Relief items at the Panama Airport being prepared for airlift to Venezuela Photo: IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

UN agency, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has airlifted core relief supplies to support affected communities in Venezuela following the devastating earthquake on 24 June 2026, which caused widespread damage and urgent humanitarian needs. 

“For families dealing with the aftermath of an earthquake, whether and when they receive initial assistance can make a big difference for how they are able to recover,” said Kim Eling, IOM Senior Director for Strategy and External Engagement. “Our partnership with DHL demonstrates how strategic collaboration with the private sector can help humanitarian organizations deliver essential assistance more quickly, ensuring affected communities receive the support they need when every moment counts.”

The humanitarian cargo was transported from IOM’s global stocks hub in Panama to Caracas on an in-kind cargo flight arranged and funded by DHL’s Disaster Response Team. The flight arrived at Simón Bolívar International Airport on 7 July 2026, carrying essential relief items, including jerry cans, solar lamps, and indoor privacy partitions, to support emergency shelter operations. 

The movement was coordinated through close collaboration between IOM, the Government of Venezuela, and the United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot (UNHRD) in Panama. This joint effort enabled efficient planning, rapid execution, and timely delivery of assistance to communities most affected by the earthquake. 

IOM sincerely thanks DHL’s Disaster Response Team for its generous in-kind logistics support, which was vital to the rapid mobilization and transport of IOM humanitarian supplies during this critical emergency. 

This operation highlights IOM’s continued commitment to preparedness, rapid emergency response, and effective humanitarian supply chain coordination, using strategic partnerships and global prepositioning capacities to deliver life-saving assistance to crisis-affected populations. 

Continue Reading

Trending