Connect with us

Uncategorized

500 people abducted at sea! Malta coordinates criminal mass pushback by proxy to a Libyan prison!

Published

3 years ago

on

Kindly share this article

Joint Statement by Alarm Phone, Sea-Watch, Mediterranea Saving Humans and EMERGENCY

The ~500 people being towed back to Libya. Foto: Consolidated Rescue Group

“They fled wars and prisons in Syria, and now, unfortunately, they have been returned to Libya.”  (A relative of people on board, reporting the pushback to Alarm Phone)

In the afternoon of 23 May 2023, Alarm Phone was called by a large group of people in distress, who had fled from Tobruk in Libya. Among the approximately 500 people were people from Syria, Egypt, Bangladesh and Pakistan, as well as 55 children and 45 women. The engine of the iron fishing vessel with two decks had stopped working and the boat was adrift. The GPS position that they shared showed them more than 30 nautical miles within the Maltese search and rescue (SAR) zone where the Maltese authorities have the responsibility to coordinate a rescue operation.

Map with their position. Foto: Alarm Phone

Less than an hour after the first call from the people in distress, Alarm Phone alerted RCC Malta and MRCC Rome in Italy, as well as several vessels of the civil fleet, who were operative far off the coast of western Libya. In the following hours, the situation for the 500 people in distress worsened: More and more water entered the boat and those on the lower deck had to escape to the upper deck, as they reported to Alarm Phone. Several merchant vessels passed by in the distance and did not intervene to assist the distressed. At some point in the night from 23 to 24 May, the people told Alarm Phone that a merchant vessel had almost collided with them – this further indicates that RCC Malta failed to inform the ships in the area about the drifting boat with 500 people in distress.

Throughout the night, Alarm Phone remained in continuous contact with the group. The last time Alarm Phone spoke to the group was on 24 May at 6:20h CEST. The people reported an unchanged situation, with the boat remaining adrift. The responsible authority for the Maltese search and rescue zone, RCC Malta, continued to not respond to the distress alerts. At 11:44h CEST, as their satellite phone credit that was monitored by Alarm Phone indicated, the distressed used their satellite phone to make a call for the last time – it is unclear who they reached out to. After that, neither the relatives and friends of the people on board who had contacted Alarm Phone, nor Alarm Phone were able to reconnect to the people in distress again. Over the following hours, more and more people started to reach out to Alarm Phone, asking about the fate of their loved-ones.

At 13:45h CEST Sea-Watch’s aircraft Seabird 2, arrived in the area of the last known position and searched for the boat in distress. The crew was unable to find the big fishing vessel with the about 500 people onboard. How could such a big group on a fishing vessel disappear?

In the night from 24 to 25 May, Life support of the NGO EMERGENCY and other vessels of the civil fleet reached the area and started searching for the disappeared boat during the whole day. No state asset helped in the search. Instead, authorities kept silent about the fate of the group. Also the aircraft Seabird 2 searched again for the missing boat on 25 May, even covering a larger area than the day before. The capacities of the NGO ships could have been utilized to save lives, rather than wasting them on a search that was already known to be futile.

Alarm Phone, EMERGENCY and rescue NGOs repeatedly reached out to the Italian and Maltese authorities in order to request information regarding the fate of the missing boat. Fears that the 500 people may have been intercepted and forcibly returned to Libya began to grow. These fears were confirmed in the morning of the following day: The 500 people had not been rescued. Instead, they had been towed back – over 330km – to the Libyan port of Benghazi – an illegal pushback coordinated by RCC Malta. According to relatives, the 500 people were brought to a prison in Benghazi.

Instead of bringing people who had tried to escape from the extreme violence people on the move experience in Libya to a place of safety, an authority of a European member state – namely RCC Malta – decided to organise a mass pushback by proxy at sea, forcing 500 people across 330km into a Libyan prison.  Given that Malta’s systematic non-assistance within the Maltese SAR zone has been long established, the Italian authorities should have mobilised rescue efforts in order to protect 500 lives and guarantee their disembarkation at a place of safety.

We demand answers:

  • Why did RCC Malta fail to coordinate the rescue of this boat in distress as the responsible authority in the Maltese SAR zone, instead organising a pushback by proxy? Why were the Armed Forces of Malta not immediately dispatched to assist the boat in distress, thereby endangering 500 lives? Why did RCC Malta fail to order any of the several merchant vessels in the vicinity to assist the boat in distress?
  • Aware of Malta’s policy and practice of systematic non-assistance and informed of the distress case, why did the Italian Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre fail to send out adequate rescue assets in order to assist the boat in distress?
  • The airplane “Seagull” of European EUNAVFOR MED Operation Irini was flying in the area of the last known position of the boat in distress between 13:31h and 14:12h CEST of 24 May, the same time when the contact to the people onboard the drifting boat was lost. Also the EUNAVFOR MED Operation Irini Warship “FGS Bonn” was only at 100km from the boat in distress. Why didn’t they rescue the people in distress?
  • What is the identity of the Libyan fishing boat and its crew that carried out the pushback? Did the crew on the vessel that abducted the group in distress, under the coordination of RCC Malta, falsely tell the people they would rescue them and bring them to Europe?
  • Which role did the vessel TAREQ BIN ZEYAD (IMO 9889930) play, which was tracked at N 34 51 E 19 46 at 6:10h CEST of 24 May,  close to the drifting boat, which shortly after disappeared? TAREQ BIN ZEYAD is normally on duty in the area of Benghazi port only. This vessel was named by a well-known Libyan militia, operating in that area. It has been deployed in the perpetration of numerous war crimes and the violation of people’s fundamental rights.

We call on:

  • the Maltese RCC to fullfil its duties under international maritime law and to ensure that people in distress at sea are rescued with the subsequent disembarkation in a place of safety in Europe.
  • European state actors, including rescue coordination centers, and EUNAVFOR MED IRINI, to share all relevant information with civil actors to ensure that persons in distress at sea are rescued without any delay.
  • the Maltese and Italian RCC to transparently disclose what information they had on both the boat in distress, the unidentified fishing boat that carried out the illegal pushback, and the vessel TAREQ BIN ZEYAD, and what the involvement of the Maltese and Italian RCC was in the forced return of the 500 persons in distress.

TIMELINE (ALL TIMESTAMPS IN CEST)

23 MAY

15:27 Alarm Phone receives a distress call in Arabic.

15:40 Alarm Phone calls back with an Arabic speaker: The people report that they had left from Tobruk. They share a GPS-position, which shows them in the Maltese search and rescue zone: N 34 55 E 19 45. They say that the engine of the boat is not working anymore, that the boat is a rusty iron boat and that water enters the boat. They note that they are around 500 people, including 45 women, and 55 children and report that they have to take water out of the boat with buckets. They say that there are no life jackets on board. According to their account, the boat has two decks and about half of the people are on the lower deck. There are pregnant women among them. The people emphasise that the boat is in danger of capsizing. They also say that they saw a black and red ship passing by.

16:04 Alarm Phone sends an email to alert authorities, putting several UNHCR officers in cc, as well as SAR NGO ships which are operational.

16:20 Alarm Phone speaks with the distressed again who report that their engine is still not working and no one knows how to fix it. The boat remains adrift.

16:30 Alarm Phone calls RCC Malta. They confirm that they received the email and the operator says they will do something. Alarm Phone alerts the company of merchant vessel SIARGAO, IMO 305473000, vessel in position N 34 46, E 19 34, which is close to the boat in distress, but it doesn’t intervene.

16:45 Alarm Phone realizes that the airplane Seagull of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Irini was flying in the morning in the direction of the drifting boat, at around 09:00h CEST at position N 35 06 E 19 06 the ADS-B signal stopped, which is about 60km north-west of the drifting boat in distress. No Inmarsat message (alerting vessels about boats in distress) seems to have been issued by the Italian and Maltese authorities.

16:27 The people in distress report an oil tanker in the distance. This time, a woman is on the phone, saying that they are in need of help. The woman repeats “the boat is sinking”. A child is crying in the background.

17:02 Life Support, the vessel of the NGO EMERGENCY sends an E-Mail to the relevant RCC, offering assistance to go the place of distress to perform an assessment and provide assistance in case of need. Competent authorities are required to coordinate and authorise the SAR operations, should immediate assistance be deemed necessary. Life Support then altered its course to reach the latest known position.

17:04 The distressed report that one of the women is about to give birth. They say that there is a ship on their left, carrying ‘red tanks’.

17:28 Alarm Phone tweets: “Alarm Phone was alerted by a large boat in distress. The people report that they fled from #Libya several days ago & that their engine has stopped. Authorities are informed – rescue efforts are needed urgently & without delay!” https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1661031464576663555?s=09

18:00 The people on board report that more water entered the boat and that all people on the lower deck moved to the upper deck. Now the boat drifts, moving to the left and right. The ship with four red tanks on board is still in sight.

18:22 Alarm Phone sends another email, including to the shipping company Briese, manager of SIARGAO.

18:35 Other vessels nearby are the OCEAN LEO, IMO 9258117 and SEA ICON, IMO 9806615.

18:56 Alarm Phone receives another call by the people in distress. They say the situation is becoming increasingly dangerous. They report that someone contacted them and asked for details like the number of people on board, the number of women, the number of children, and the situation on board. They say that they spoke to this person in English and Arabic. They add that they have no drinking water left.

19:00 The NGO EMERGENCY (operating the Life Support) calls the Italian MRCC to inquire about the coordination of the SAR case and operations ongoing. Italian MRCC responds that the case is in the Maltese SRR and advises to contact the Maltese RCC. Several attempts to reach the Maltese authorities failed afterwards.

19:17 Alarm Phone receives a new position: N 34 59 E 019 42, position clearly in the Maltese SAR area. The people say a mechanic among them is trying to fix the engine but they need oil to make it work again.

19:35 The oil tanker STI GUARD is only three nautical miles away from them but doesn´t intervene.

19:40 The people report that the situation remains dangerous. They are very afraid and say they would rather jump into the sea than to go back to Libya. They share a new position which shows them quite close to the position received at 19:17h.

20:01 Alarm Phone sends an E-Mail to authorities updating them about the situation.

20:09 Alarm Phone receives an E-Mail from the NGO vessel Humanity1, operated by SOS Humanity, which states that they are heading towards the last known position.

20:25 Alarm Phone calls MRCC Rome: The officer on the phone confirms that they have received the latest E-Mail update. Alarm Phone asks if there is a rescue operation ongoing and who is coordinating. The officer responds that they do not know, adding that they have lots of SAR cases and therefore cannot stay on the phone.

20:36 Ships close to the latest known position are ZHEN HUA 27, IMO 8710182, and MAERSK KOTKA, IMO 9085534.

20:39 The people on the phone report two container ships very close by but moving further away from them. One of the vessels has many illuminated windows. We cannot get more info about these two ships. They also say that somebody pointed a spotlight at them, but it’s unclear which boat did that.

20:56 The people on board say that the spotlight was pointed at them from one of the container ships, not the one with the many illuminated windows.

21:02  Alarm Phone calls the RCC Malta and asks the officer if there is a rescue operation ongoing and if they are coordinating the rescue. The officer responds that Alarm Phone should send an email. Alarm Phone confirms that an E-Mail had been sent. The officer responds that he cannot check but that it is good. We ask again but he says he has no information.

22:25 Alarm Phone receives a new location: N 35 02 E 019 39 and sends an update E-mail to authorities.

24 MAY

00:18 The people on board report that they had an incident some minutes earlier. A very large vessel that seemed not to see them nearly collided with them. The people pointed their mobile phone lights toward the large vessel, then it turned away. They say that they are still drifting, also their petrol is finished.

00:28 The people in distress pass a new location to Alarm Phone: N 35 00 E 19 39. Alarm Phone sends an E-Mail to the Italian und Maltese RCCs and rescue NGOs, updating them on the boat’s location and situation.

06:10 The vessel TAREQ BEN ZEYAD from Benghazi moves in peculiar patterns. The last AIS signal of TAREQ BIN ZEYAD is issued close to the last known position of the distressed boat at N 34 53 E 019 45.

06:20 In the Alarm Phone’s last contact with the people in distress, they pass a new location: N 34 57 E 019 34. The situation is still unchanged, engine stopped, boat adrift. They ask when rescue is coming.

06:27 Alarm Phone sends an update to authorities per E-Mail.

07:58 Alarm Phone calls RCC Malta once again who confirm that they received the E-Mail. When mentioning the boat with 500 people adrift, the officer says “wait a second” and puts the call on hold. Shortly after, the officer comes back and replies that they are currently very busy. When asked if they are going to assist the distressed boat, the officer hangs up the phone.

08:27 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, the line is busy.

09:00 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, it rings but no answer.

09:05 EMERGENCY reaches the Maltese joint operations by phone. They advise to write an email to report the distress case. When reminded that an email had already been sent, they respond that they are busy, do not know more and cannot provide additional numbers to contact.

11:42 The NGO vessel Life Support, operated by EMERGENCY sends a second email, reiterating the information previously shared and requiring coordination. Also this email remains unanswered.

10:03 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, phone rings but no answer.

11:44 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, phone rings but no answer. The credit of the satellite phone dropped to 41.97, indicating the last use of the satellite phone.

12:39 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, the phone rings but no answer. Their phone credit remains unchanged at 41.97.

13:31-14:12 The airplane Seagull of EUNAVFOR MED Irini is flying in the area of the boat’s last known position.

13:45 Seabird 2, monitoring airplane from Sea-Watch, reaches the area and searches unsuccessfully for the boat until 16:10h.

13:56 Alarm Phone calls RCC Malta who note that they are really busy and will answer by email, which they do not do.

14:04 Alarm Phone learns that, according to the Italian coastguard, this case is coordinated by RCC Malta.

14:09 Alarm Phone sends a SMS to the boat in distress, asking for their GPS position and if they can see an airplane.

14:10 Alarm Phone calls the boat in distress, it rings but no answer.

14:25 Seabird 2 spots EUNAVFOR MED Warship  “FGS Bonn” (German Navy) in position N 34 40 E 018 51, approximately 55nm from the last known position of the boat in distress.

16:10 Seabird 2 leaves the area after its unsuccessful search.

In the following hours and days, Alarm Phone is continuously calling the boat, but is unable to reach the people . Several relatives contact Alarm Phone to ask about the fate of the boat.

00:00 The NGO vessel Life Support, operated by Emergency, starts searching for the boat. Also Ocean Viking, operated by SOS MEDITERRANEE, and Humanity 1, operated by SOS Humanity, are supporting in the search for the boat.

25 MAY

Life support of EMERGENCY continues to do search pattern in order to locate the missing boat.

08:38 Alarm Phone calls RCC Malta to ask about the boat. The officer says that they would pass the request to the Officer on Duty and that we can call again in one hour.

09:50 Alarm Phone calls RCC Malta again, the Officer on Duty does not take the call but asks Alarm Phone to send an email.

11:58 Alarm Phone sends an email to all authorities, including Frontex and EUNAVFOR MED to ask for information about the missing boat: “Since yesterday we lost contact to the people on the boat. We receive a lot of phone calls of relatives who are afraid what happened to there beloved ones. Can you provide any information what you did to rescue the boat in urgent distress? Can you confirm that Malta coordinated the Search and Rescue Operation and that the people are safe? Thank you for your attention, Watch the Med – Alarmphone”

13:10 The airplance Seabird 2 reaches the area again and searches unsuccessfully for the boat until 17:40.

17:40 Seabird 2 leaves area after an unsuccessful search.

18:01 The NGO civil fleet Ocean Viking, Life Support and Humanity 1 were unable to locate the boat in distress and abandon the search. Life support tweets: https://twitter.com/emergency_ong/status/1661770984557363200

19:53 Alarm Phone calls the Italian authorities in Augusta, Catania and Rome asking information about the disappered boat. Officials respond that the boat was in Malta SAR. After Alarm Phone saying to be worried for a possible pushback from Malta SAR which would be forbidded by international law, the MRCC Rome officer recommends Alarm Phone “not to be worried”.

20:00 Alarm Phone calls MRCC Rome but does not receive information.

20:13 The people in distress are still not reachable.

26 MAY

12:20 A relative reports to Alarm Phone that the 500 people were brought back to Benghazi, Libya.

13:13 More people contact Alarm Phone, saying that the people were returned by force to Libya.

15:15 Further persons call Alarm Phone and confirm that the people are back in Libya. They say that they were detained in a prison in Benghazi. They are worried that they are being mistreated.

16:42 One of the relatives of people on the boat provides further information regarding the pullback: “They told us now that they had entered the territorial waters, but the boat got stuck with them and they had to retreat, then the Libyan forces came and forced them to turn back. My brother spoke to me three hours ago and told me he was in a prison in Benghazi.”

17:04 Another person contacts Alarm Phone to report that the mobile devices of all persons were shut down after they were shortly able to call some family members. One relative adds that the people fled wars and prisons in Syria, and now, unfortunately, they have been returned to Libya.  One of the relatives highlighted the violent and dangerous behaviour of the Libyan forces, stating: “Libyan coastguard wanted sunk them by pushing boat with strong waves and hitting them.”

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Refugees in Libya raises alarm over alleged sexual harassment of minor

Published

2 weeks ago

on

August 24, 2026

By

Kindly share this article

Refugees in Libya, an organisation advocating for refugees and migrants, has raised concerns over the alleged sexual harassment of a young Black refugee girl by a taxi driver in Tripoli.

In a post published on X on August 23, the organisation identified the alleged perpetrator as Ali, also known by the nickname “Al-Boura,” and said he is a resident of Qasr Bin Ghashir, Tripoli.

According to Refugees in Libya, the incident occurred on August 17 when Ali allegedly sexually harassed the girl, who the organisation said was a minor.

The organisation said the girl repeatedly asked the driver to stop and told him that she was underage and did not consent to his touching her. Despite her objections, the driver allegedly continued.

Refugees in Libya said the girl recorded and later shared a video of the incident on TikTok because she was afraid to report the alleged crime through official channels.

The organisation claimed that reporting such an incident could expose the refugee to the risk of arrest before she could formally file a complaint, highlighting what it described as the vulnerability of refugee women and girls in Libya.

The video subsequently circulated widely on social media, prompting mixed reactions from Libyans. According to Refugees in Libya, some users called for Ali’s arrest, while others reportedly demanded the arrest and imprisonment of the girl, questioning why she had recorded the incident and accusing her of being an agent of Western interests.

The organisation said it has since lost contact with the girl and does not know her current whereabouts, while the video continues to circulate online.

Refugees in Libya also expressed concern that, despite information allegedly being made public about Ali’s whereabouts, there was still no evidence that law enforcement authorities had arrested him.

The organisation’s account could not independently establish whether an arrest had been made or verify the full circumstances surrounding the allegations.

The case has renewed concerns among refugee and migrant rights advocates about the protection of vulnerable migrants in Libya, particularly women and girls who may face barriers to reporting sexual violence and harassment.

Refugees in Libya called attention to the situation as part of its broader advocacy over the treatment and safety of refugees and migrants in the country.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

58 organisations, movements sign Cotonou Manifesto for freedom of movement

Published

3 weeks ago

on

August 12, 2026

By

Kindly share this article

Fifty-eight organisations, movements and collectives have signed the Cotonou Manifesto for Freedom of Movement, calling for an end to the externalisation of border controls, the closure of detention centres and greater protection for people on the move.

The manifesto was developed collectively through the Migration Village at the recently held World Social Forum in Cotonou, Benin. It was authored and led by survivors of migration routes and supported by organisations working on migration, human rights and freedom of movement.

Titled “Our Bodies Are Not Your Borders,” the manifesto brings together victims, survivors, families, activists and organisations that said they were committed to dismantling what they described as a racist migration regime.

The signatories said many survivors had experienced deadly desert crossings, prisons, detention centres, deportation flights, pushbacks, racist attacks, abductions at sea, enslavement and other forms of inhumane treatment. They argued that the suffering and deaths of migrants had increasingly been used to justify restrictive migration policies.

The groups accused the European Union of being at the forefront of policies that externalise border controls into Africa, saying European governments have funded and supported governments, coastguards, militias, detention systems and surveillance infrastructure to prevent migrants from reaching European territory.

They specifically cited cooperation with countries including Tunisia, Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Niger, Mauritania and Senegal, arguing that such arrangements had transformed parts of Africa into places of detention and danger for migrants. Libya, they said, had become a “laboratory” for the system.

The manifesto also criticised the role of Frontex, accusing the European Border and Coast Guard Agency of contributing to pushbacks and facilitating the interception of refugee boats. It further criticised what it described as the extension of Europe’s migration security apparatus into African countries.

The organisations also expressed concern about the role of international agencies, including the International Organisation for Migration and UNHCR, arguing that terms such as “risk analysis,” “border management” and “voluntary return” can conceal policies aimed at tracking, containing and deporting migrants before they reach their intended destinations.

African governments were also criticised. The signatories said African states could not continue portraying themselves solely as victims of European migration policies while accepting funding to police Europe’s borders and participating in the detention, deportation and abandonment of Africans on the continent.

They also accused the African Union of failing to adequately respond to the treatment of African migrants and said the continent’s commitment to free movement remained severely restricted.

The manifesto called for an end to the externalisation of border control, the closure of detention and so-called return centres, and effective access to asylum. It also urged states to honour international human rights and refugee protection commitments and called for survivors and families of migrants who died along migration routes to participate in institutions and negotiations affecting their lives.

The signatories further called for freedom of movement and the right of people to choose where they live and travel safely. They demanded the abolition of visa systems, arguing that these systems disproportionately burden people from the Global South.

According to the manifesto, freedom of movement would promote economic, social and cultural ties between countries and peoples, while strengthening women’s and gender minorities’ ability to seek safety and freedom. The signatories also linked free movement to Pan-African unity and decolonisation.

The groups said migrants and their allies would continue building transnational networks and solidarity structures to challenge restrictive border systems and support people on the move.

The manifesto concluded with a series of declarations, including: “Our forced migration is not your invasion,” “Human beings are not your bargaining chips,” “Our bodies are not Europe’s borders,” and “Our lives are not Africa’s currency.”

Among the 58 signatories are Refugees in Libya, WatchTheMed Alarm Phone, Migreurop, SOSAPROFEM, Southern Africa Migration Network, Voice of Migrants Association, Female Returned Migrant Network, Migrants Lives Matter, Advocates Female Migrants Initiative and several other African, European and international organisations.

The manifesto said the Migration Village at the World Social Forum in Cotonou represented another step toward strengthening cooperation among movements and survivors in the continuing campaign for freedom of movement.

The manifestor was authored and led by survivors. 

Supported by the following organizations, movements and collectives:

1. Advocates Female Migrants initiative (Nigeria)

2. Afrique-Europe Interact (transnational network)

3. Al Bawsala (Tunisia)

4. Alarme Phone Sahara

5. Alerte Migration Afrique (Burkina Faso)

6. Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas Studies Program, San Francisco State University (USA)

7. Association des Mères des Disparus en Tunisie (Tunisia)

8. Association Éducation Togo (AET, Togo)

9. Association Malienne des Expulsés (AME, Mali)

10. Association Marocaine d’aide aux migrants en situation vulnérable (AMSV, Morocco)

11. Association Marocaine des droits humains (AMDH, Morocco)

12. Association Mauritanienne pour la Citoyenneté et le Développement (AMCD, Mauritania)

13. Association Nationale des Partenaires Migrants (ANPM, Senegal)

14. Association Togolaise des Expulsés (ATE, Togo)

15. Boza Fii (Senegal)

16. Caritas Dakar/PARI (Senegal)

17. Confédération générale autonome des travailleurs en Algérie (CGATA, Algeria)

18. Citoyennes Citoyens Debout Mauritanie (CCD, Mauritania)

19. Climáximo (Portugal)

20. Collective Against the Criminalization of Solidarity and Civic Engagement in Tunisia

21. Conseil des Migrants Subsahariens au Maroc (CMSM, Morocco)

22. CRID (France)

23. Direy Ben Gao/ RMSM (Mali)

24. Ebrima Migrant Situation Foundation (Gambia)

25. Female Returned Migrant network – FREMNET (Nigeria)

26. 50 Out of Many (Greece)

27. Groupe solidarité des groupements féminins au Togo

28. Jeunesses Nigérienne au Service du Développement Durable (JNSDD AIKIN KASA) (Niger)

29. KISA – Equality, Support, Antiracism (Cyprus)

30. Medico International

31. Mediterr

32. Migrants Lives Matter (Nigeria)

33. Migreurop (Euro-African network)

34. MV Louise Michel project

35. Network of Ex-Asylum Seekers – NEAS (Sierra Leone)

36. Network of People with Migration Experience (Nigeria)

37. Nomad 08 (Tunisia)

38. OGLMI – Terre de Liberté (Guinea)

39. ONG Opinion Éclairée (Ivory Coast)

40. ONG UNION FAIT LA FORCE (Benin)

41. Palestinian NGOs Network

42. Refugees in Libya (RiL)

43. Réseau Maghreb Sahel sur les Migrations

44. Réseau ROA-PRODMAC (African network)

45. Riposte internationale (Algeria)

46. Right2Protest Project Africa

47. Rootstv.tn (Tunisia)

48. Solidarités Asie France (SAF)

49. SOSAPROFEM (Senegal)

50. Southern Africa Migration Network (SAMIN)

51. Teaching Palestine: Pedagogical Praxis and the Indivisibility of Justice

52. trans-border.net Editorial Team

53. Un Monde Avenir (Cameroon)

54. Voice of Migrants Association – VOMA (Nigeria)

55. Voice of Talia Initiative Foundation (Nigeria)

56. WatchTheMed Alarm Phone

57. Welcome to Europe

58. We`ll Come United (Germany)

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Venezuela: IOM delivers support via in-kind cargo flight  funded by DHL’s Disaster Response Team

Published

2 months ago

on

July 13, 2026

By

Relief items at the Panama Airport being prepared for airlift to Venezuela Photo: IOM/2026
Kindly share this article

UN agency, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) has airlifted core relief supplies to support affected communities in Venezuela following the devastating earthquake on 24 June 2026, which caused widespread damage and urgent humanitarian needs. 

“For families dealing with the aftermath of an earthquake, whether and when they receive initial assistance can make a big difference for how they are able to recover,” said Kim Eling, IOM Senior Director for Strategy and External Engagement. “Our partnership with DHL demonstrates how strategic collaboration with the private sector can help humanitarian organizations deliver essential assistance more quickly, ensuring affected communities receive the support they need when every moment counts.”

The humanitarian cargo was transported from IOM’s global stocks hub in Panama to Caracas on an in-kind cargo flight arranged and funded by DHL’s Disaster Response Team. The flight arrived at Simón Bolívar International Airport on 7 July 2026, carrying essential relief items, including jerry cans, solar lamps, and indoor privacy partitions, to support emergency shelter operations. 

The movement was coordinated through close collaboration between IOM, the Government of Venezuela, and the United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot (UNHRD) in Panama. This joint effort enabled efficient planning, rapid execution, and timely delivery of assistance to communities most affected by the earthquake. 

IOM sincerely thanks DHL’s Disaster Response Team for its generous in-kind logistics support, which was vital to the rapid mobilization and transport of IOM humanitarian supplies during this critical emergency. 

This operation highlights IOM’s continued commitment to preparedness, rapid emergency response, and effective humanitarian supply chain coordination, using strategic partnerships and global prepositioning capacities to deliver life-saving assistance to crisis-affected populations. 

Continue Reading

Trending